JB/051/232/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/232/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/232/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/232/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>29</head>
 
<p>3. <add>Useless addition made to the</add> Voluminousness of the laws: with which increases<lb/>
<add>always</add> the difficulty of apprehending and retaining them;<pb/>
and the chance that a given disposition of law<lb/>
<del>will be useless <gap/></del> <add>will in each</add> given instance be ineffectual<lb/><lb/>
to its object; <del>in</del> effectual only to this<lb/>
purpose of drawing down punishment or other<lb/>
unexpected hardship, for want of <del>being</del> <add>having been</add> apprehended<lb/>
or retained.</p>
 
<p>4. Difficulty of knowing which of so many<lb/>
sorts of Courts to resort to How happy the suitor,<lb/>
<del>where there is</del> <add>where there</add> but one Court, <hi rend='underline'>the</hi> Court! the<lb/>
simplest of all clowns could not mistake his<lb/>
way to it. <del>The first <gap/> block be not in</del><lb/>
<del>the street could give from a <gap/> opinion</del><lb/>
<del>on the question of competence than the most <gap/> <add>ablest</add></del><lb/>
<del>advocate <gap/> now.</del> Cut courts one out of<lb/>
another with metaphysical shears, a science<lb/>
of that which ought not to have had<lb/>
existence is thus created out of nothing. To<lb/>
the <add>necessary</add> science of knowing whether you have a<lb/>
right and a remedy for it, is added the <add>unnecessary one</add> <del>science</del><lb/>
of knowing to what sort of a Judge you are to<lb/>
go in order to get your remedy. In vain have <add>you</add></p>
 





Revision as of 23:33, 7 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

29

3. Useless addition made to the Voluminousness of the laws: with which increases
always the difficulty of apprehending and retaining them;
---page break---
and the chance that a given disposition of law
will be useless will in each given instance be ineffectual

to its object; in effectual only to this
purpose of drawing down punishment or other
unexpected hardship, for want of being having been apprehended
or retained.

4. Difficulty of knowing which of so many
sorts of Courts to resort to How happy the suitor,
where there is where there but one Court, the Court! the
simplest of all clowns could not mistake his
way to it. The first block be not in
the street could give from a opinion
on the question of competence than the most ablest
advocate now. Cut courts one out of
another with metaphysical shears, a science
of that which ought not to have had
existence is thus created out of nothing. To
the necessary science of knowing whether you have a
right and a remedy for it, is added the unnecessary one science
of knowing to what sort of a Judge you are to
go in order to get your remedy. In vain have you




Identifier: | JB/051/232/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

23-24

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

232

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f29 / f30

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16397

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in