★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<head>33</head> | <head>33</head> | ||
<p> <note> False Grammar</note> Besides <del>that</del> <add>this | <p>trustee after every one of them has been excluded<lb/> from doing.</p> | ||
<add>affirmative</add> would stand upon the party of reason: which party their <add>more gallant </add> antagonists upon the ground of the differences of character attending the<lb/>difference of sex <add>gender</add> might dispute<lb/> It ought to be observed <add>This doubt <add><gap/></add> | |||
<p> <note>False Grammar</note> Besides <del>that</del> <add>this the Phrase</add> "<hi rend='underline'> <del><gap/></del> Persons</hi>" <del>shall not be capable of</del><lb/> farm<del>ing</del> Turnpike Toll <del>during such Time </del> as<lb/> <add>while</add> <hi rend='underline'>he</hi> <del>shall</del> keep a Public House, contains an <add>seems an </add> <lb/> example of <add>that sort of</add> Grammatical concord, which had better <add>that it were</add><lb/> to be <sic>alter'd</sic> <add>better to alter </add> in condescension to the <add>vulgar &</add> illiterate<lb/> who are not sufficiently <sic>familiarized</sic> to the<lb/>sublimities of the Legislative <sic>stile</sic>. </p> | |||
<p> A Doubt also may arise <add>whether</add> under the word "her"<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>v. §15 in VIII f 6</note> <del>a person</del> <lb/> <del>of</del> the female Sex be <del>excluded</del> <add>included</add> and this might be<lb/> a subject for many learned arguments:<hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> | |||
<note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> Those on the negative side would insist worth a high hand on the presumption which the one that is taken <hi rend='superscript'>#</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>#</hi> as in § 42,43,45 {which list it is applied to Toll-gatherer] [not in 46] <del><gap/></del> 49, 50 [not 53] [not 55] 56, 57, 60 </note> | |||
<del>of</del> <add>to</add> specifying this but also where it is meant to be included <del>could</del> affords, that it was <del>set as</del> meant<lb/><add>to be so here: those on the <del>negative</del><add>affirmative</add> would stand upon the party of reason: which party their <add>more gallant </add> antagonists upon the ground of the differences of character attending the<lb/>difference of sex <add>gender</add> might dispute<lb/> It ought to be observed <add>This doubt <add><gap/> however</add> that the doubt arises</add> arises not from the specification<lb/> of Sex being <del>included</del> <add>omitted</add> here, <add>that the doubt arises </add> but from its being inserted elsewhere.</note> | |||
it would<lb/> doubtless be a pleasure to hear these arguments:<lb/> but as the pleasure of knowing what <gap/> about is<lb/> still greater, it is submitted whether this <unclear>law</unclear><lb/> may not be <sic>alter'd</sic> <del>with</del> <add>to</add> advantage.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
excellent establishment of Houses of Industry for
A large districts. The prejudices of the poor as long as
they continue against that useful institution Scheme might
drive them into this, & the first would afford an
answer in a certain degree to their complaints of the
hardship of the latter. in it.
---page break---
33
trustee after every one of them has been excluded
from doing.
False Grammar Besides that this the Phrase " Persons" shall not be capable of
farming Turnpike Toll during such Time as
while he shall keep a Public House, contains an seems an
example of that sort of Grammatical concord, which had better that it were
to be alter'd better to alter in condescension to the vulgar & illiterate
who are not sufficiently familiarized to the
sublimities of the Legislative stile.
A Doubt also may arise whether under the word "her"+ +v. §15 in VIII f 6 a person
of the female Sex be excluded included and this might be
a subject for many learned arguments:[+]
[+] Those on the negative side would insist worth a high hand on the presumption which the one that is taken # <note># as in § 42,43,45 {which list it is applied to Toll-gatherer] [not in 46] 49, 50 [not 53] [not 55] 56, 57, 60
of to specifying this but also where it is meant to be included could affords, that it was set as meant
to be so here: those on the negative<add>affirmative would stand upon the party of reason: which party their more gallant antagonists upon the ground of the differences of character attending the
difference of sex gender might dispute
It ought to be observed This doubt <add> however that the doubt arises</add> arises not from the specification
of Sex being included omitted here, that the doubt arises but from its being inserted elsewhere.</note>
it would
doubtless be a pleasure to hear these arguments:
but as the pleasure of knowing what about is
still greater, it is submitted whether this law
may not be alter'd with to advantage.
|
Identifier: | JB/079/106/005"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
079 |
|||
|
106 |
|||
|
005 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
25548 |
|||
