JB/079/047/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/047/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- This document consists of two pages joined horizontally, each set out in tow columns.  The top page has been transcribed first --><head>NOTRIETY  -  HODGE PODGE Acts    RS</head><lb/><p><note>+ viz: any <gap/> Acts before mentioned are outdone are left far behind by <gap/> miscellany </note><del>but</del> all these <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> are left far behind by <del>the Stat.</del> Act.<lb/> of the <gap/> c.26.  By this all comprehensive Act <lb/> 23.<del>G</del>.2 <gap/> <del>by which </del> no fewer than 11 <lb/> different purposes are accomplished <add> executed </add> <del> all as </del> <add> than which </add> <lb/> <del> distant from each other as any <gap/> thing.</del> <add> It more various could handle have been assigned </add> </p> <p> <del>That are most to</del> <add> This proposes as the Title announces them <lb/> It is made as the Title informs us  - To continue </p><p> &amp;c </p> <p><note> All <gap/> Acts <gap/> </note> As in this Statute there is something <add> a spice of everything, </add> it's <del>some</del> <add> different </add> <lb/> <add> provisions <unclear>come</unclear> <add> of course as one might be sure they would to <lb/> have something done to them by  <sic>succeding</sic> <lb/> Laws.  I turned to <add> several of </add> those Laws expecting to <lb/> use it according to the good old custom, brought <lb/> in over again in each of them: I was mistaken <lb/> - frightened doubtless at the immensity of its <lb/> appearance, of all the <gap/> of those Statutes <lb/> there was not one that <del> executed it </del> <add> <gap/> </add> <add> <gap/> upon [swallowing] it </add> it was only <lb/> referred as being an Act of such a year of that <lb/> Kings reign without saying what Chapter <lb/> <del> or what </del> <add> it is or with </add> what Section of it they <gap/> to do: as </p><pb/> <p> <note> For every thing by which dificulty can be lessen'd is contrary to custom as every thing by which it can be augmented is of course </note> <lb/> that would be contrary to custom: <del>for <unclear>empathy</unclear> </del> <lb/> <del> that by which <add> <del>can lessen</del> </add>a problem is made </del> <add> <del> differently <gap/> </del> </add> is contra <lb/> to <del>write</del> <add><del> usage <.del></add> <del> and every thing whereby it can be </del> <add><del> as every thing than can augment it </del> </add> <lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> <add> <del>is <gap/> </add> </del> <add> is of course </add> </p> <p> It is some satisfaction however to find <del> that the </del> <add> by this amongst </add> <lb/> others that the repeating of the <lb/> Title of a Statute 20 times over in <unclear>many</unclear> <lb/> <sic>succeding</sic> ones is not a matter of <add> absolute </add> necessity: <lb/> &amp; that when it is done, it is done out of <lb/> the superabundance  <add> an overflowing</add> of generosity: <del> found where </del> <lb/> <del> we learn that the stopping of that generosity <lb/> <del> and all <gap/> <add> <gap/> </add> <unclear>inclusiveness</unclear> is a thing that may be </del> <lb/> <del> done [whether the fall of the Parliament <gap/> </del> <lb/> <del> or the <gap/> <gap/> of the Statute] If <gap/> </del><lb/> <del> could have been <gap/><gap/> <gap/> </del> <lb/> <del> Laws <gap/> [certainly <add> <gap/> </add>] and different <gap/>. </del> <add> <note> this leads us to conclude <add> collect </add> that this <add> like </add> generosity might be stopped by a general resolution in all future instances, and the state still subsist: which without a precedent it might have been termerity to affirm. </note> </add> </p><pb/><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- This document consists of two pages joined horizontally, each set out in two columns.  The top page has been transcribed first --><head>NOTRIETY  -  HODGE PODGE Acts    RS</head><lb/><p><note>+ viz: any <gap/> Acts before mentioned are outdone are left far behind by <gap/> miscellany </note><lb/><del>but</del> all these <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> are left far behind by <del>the Stat.</del> Act.<lb/> of the <gap/> c.26.  By this all comprehensive Act <lb/> 23.<del>G</del>.2 <gap/> <del>by which </del> no fewer than 11 <lb/> different purposes are accomplished <add> executed </add> <del> all as </del> <add> than which </add> <lb/> <del> distant from each other as any <gap/> thing.</del> <add> It more various could hardly have been assigned </add> </p> <p> <del>That are most to</del> <add> This proposes as the Title announces them </add><lb/> It is made as the Title informs us  - To continue </p><p> &amp;c </p> <p><note> All <gap/> Acts <gap/> </note> <lb/>As in this Statute there is something <add> a <unclear>spice</unclear> of everything, </add> it's <del>some</del> <add> different </add> <lb/> <add> provisions <unclear>come</unclear> </add> of course as one might be sure they would to <lb/> have something done to them by  <sic>succeding</sic> <lb/> Laws.  I turned to <add> several of </add> those Laws expecting to <lb/> use it according to the good old custom, brought <lb/> in over again in each of them: I was mistaken <lb/> - frightened doubtless at the immensity of its <lb/> appearance, of all the <gap/> of those Statutes <lb/> there was not one that <del> executed it </del> <add> <gap/> </add> <add> <gap/> upon [swallowing] it </add> it was only <lb/> referred as being an Act of such a year of that <lb/> Kings reign without saying what Chapter <lb/> <del> or what </del> <add> it is or with </add> what Section of it they <gap/> to do: as </p><pb/> <p> that would be contrary to custom: <del>for <unclear>empathy</unclear> </del> <lb/> <del> that by which <add> <del>can lessen</del> </add>a problem is made </del> <add> <del> differently <gap/> </del> </add> is contra <lb/> to <del>write</del> <add><del> usage <.del></add> <del> and every thing whereby it can be </del> <add><del> as every thing than can augment it </del> </add> <lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> <add> <del>is <gap/> </add> </del> <add> is of course </add> <lb/><note> For every thing by which difficulty can be lessen'd is contrary to custom as every thing by which it can be augmented is of course </note> <lb/></p> <p> It is some satisfaction however to find <del> that the </del> <add> by this amongst </add> <lb/> others that the repeating of the <lb/> Title of a Statute 20 times over in <unclear>many</unclear> <lb/> <sic>succeding</sic> ones is not a matter of <add> absolute </add> necessity: <lb/> &amp; that when it is done, it is done out of <lb/> the superabundance  <add> an overflowing</add> of generosity: <del> found where </del> <lb/> <del> we learn that the stopping of that generosity <lb/> <del> and all <gap/> <add> <gap/> </add> <unclear>inclusiveness</unclear> is a thing that may be </del> <lb/> <del> done [whether the fall of the Parliament <gap/> </del> <lb/> <del> or the <gap/> <gap/> of the Statute] If <gap/> </del><lb/> <del> could have been <gap/><gap/> <gap/> </del> <lb/> <del> Laws <gap/> [certainly <add> <gap/> </add>] and different <gap/>. </del> <add> <note> this leads us to conclude <add> collect </add> that this <add> like </add> generosity might be stopped by a general resolution in all future instances, and the state still subsist: which without a precedent it might have been termerity to affirm. </note> </add> </p><pb/><!-- start of lower page --> <head>NOTRIETY  Hodge-podge Acts. Causes of them </head> <p>With respect to those instances <add> exertions</add> of <del> indemnitys to and </del> <add> recompense or </add> <lb/> <del> remission </del> <add><del> compensation</del></add> <add>exoneration</add> which the Humanity of the Legislature is <lb/> <del> always</del> so ready to extend to persons <add> individuals</add> who have been the <lb/>innocent or meritorious objects of a calamity, the <lb/> truth is [that] the <unclear>fees</unclear> of office are so enormous, <add> as</add> that <lb/> <add> sometimes </add> unless some charitable Minister will give the sufferer <lb/> <add> favoured person </add> a <unclear><hi rend='underline'>Ride</hi></unclear> upon his Bill, to <add> go near to </add> cast up the profits of the <lb/> indulgence - Better however it were, that the claims <lb/> thus eluded, which enormous is <unclear>they are</unclear>, being established, <lb/> cannot be [rejected ..]<add> defeated </add> without injustice, were satisfied <lb/> out of the <del>national</del> <add>public</add> treasure, <del> then </del> or <add> <gap/> </add> if the case is thought <lb/> to warrant a suspension, openly &amp; directly, then the <lb/>simplicity of the Legislative operations violated by [ the <gap/> <lb/> of] these deformaties. </p> <p> <del> Facts to </del></p> <p><add> <note> <del> If the reader </del> <add> Anyone who </add> will take the trouble to cast his eye over the Titles of the Statutes for <del> these</del> ...years <del>po</del> <add> back</add> will find A.D.<del> &amp; Y &amp; Z</del> riding upon an Indemnity Act P.Q. &amp;Y.Z. each upon a Money Bill &amp;c </add> </note> </p><head>COMPOS. Hodge Podge Acts.</head><pb/> <!-- small amounts of text are visible between this page and the page pasted to its right.  These have not been transcribed --> <head>NOTRIETY Hodge-podge Acts Causes of them.</head> <p>Another cause <del>of them</del> of which one knows not what <lb/> to say, of this confusion, may have been in some <lb/> instances the desperate resolution of the Lower <lb/> House to vanquish the opposition of the Upper <lb/> to a law, by taking it to a Money-Bill. <lb/> <del> But </del> these <add><gap/></add> I believe have not been frequent. <lb/> <del> Bu</del> The greatest number have none of these<lb/> excuses: I </p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:35, 21 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

NOTRIETY - HODGE PODGE Acts RS

+ viz: any Acts before mentioned are outdone are left far behind by miscellany
but all these + are left far behind by the Stat. Act.
of the c.26. By this all comprehensive Act
23.G.2 by which no fewer than 11
different purposes are accomplished executed all as than which
distant from each other as any thing. It more various could hardly have been assigned

That are most to This proposes as the Title announces them
It is made as the Title informs us - To continue

&c

All Acts
As in this Statute there is something a spice of everything, it's some different
provisions come of course as one might be sure they would to
have something done to them by succeding
Laws. I turned to several of those Laws expecting to
use it according to the good old custom, brought
in over again in each of them: I was mistaken
- frightened doubtless at the immensity of its
appearance, of all the of those Statutes
there was not one that executed it upon [swallowing] it it was only
referred as being an Act of such a year of that
Kings reign without saying what Chapter
or what it is or with what Section of it they to do: as


---page break---

that would be contrary to custom: for empathy
that by which <add> can lessen </add>a problem is made differently is contra
to write usage <.del> and every thing whereby it can be as every thing than can augment it
is is of course
For every thing by which difficulty can be lessen'd is contrary to custom as every thing by which it can be augmented is of course

It is some satisfaction however to find that the by this amongst
others that the repeating of the
Title of a Statute 20 times over in many
succeding ones is not a matter of absolute necessity:
& that when it is done, it is done out of
the superabundance an overflowing of generosity: found where
we learn that the stopping of that generosity
and all inclusiveness is a thing that may be

done [whether the fall of the Parliament
or the of the Statute] If
could have been
Laws [certainly ] and different . <note> this leads us to conclude <add> collect that this like generosity might be stopped by a general resolution in all future instances, and the state still subsist: which without a precedent it might have been termerity to affirm. </note> </add>


---page break---
NOTRIETY Hodge-podge Acts. Causes of them

With respect to those instances exertions of indemnitys to and recompense or
remission compensation exoneration which the Humanity of the Legislature is
always so ready to extend to persons individuals who have been the
innocent or meritorious objects of a calamity, the
truth is [that] the fees of office are so enormous, as that
sometimes unless some charitable Minister will give the sufferer
favoured person a Ride upon his Bill, to go near to cast up the profits of the
indulgence - Better however it were, that the claims
thus eluded, which enormous is they are, being established,
cannot be [rejected ..] defeated without injustice, were satisfied
out of the national public treasure, then or if the case is thought
to warrant a suspension, openly & directly, then the
simplicity of the Legislative operations violated by [ the
of] these deformaties.

Facts to

<note> If the reader <add> Anyone who will take the trouble to cast his eye over the Titles of the Statutes for these ...years po back will find A.D. & Y & Z riding upon an Indemnity Act P.Q. &Y.Z. each upon a Money Bill &c </add> </note>

COMPOS. Hodge Podge Acts.
---page break---
NOTRIETY Hodge-podge Acts Causes of them.

Another cause of them of which one knows not what
to say, of this confusion, may have been in some
instances the desperate resolution of the Lower
House to vanquish the opposition of the Upper
to a law, by taking it to a Money-Bill.
But these I believe have not been frequent.
Bu The greatest number have none of these
excuses: I


Identifier: | JB/079/047/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

047

Info in main headings field

compos. hodge-podge acts

Image

002

Titles

notoriety - hodge-podge acts

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

richard smith

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25489

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in