JB/051/283/001

Click Here To Edit

21-September-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.

Where If the opinion of this Judge of Appeal and
the opinion of the pauper's own sworn advocate is
against him ; I look upon it as infinitely more
likely that he a poor and consequently ignorant
man should be in the wrong than that they should :
But in a cause which happens to be especially
if the decision has of this Court of Appeal has
been confirmative of that of the immediate Court
below . But if party be at all concerned in the
cause the Public Advocate of the pauper being a
Public Advocate may be suspected of collusion , and
he and the Judge together of oppressive views : the
party therefore ought to be allowed to give themselves
the satisfaction of taking sending it out of their hands : and
when such is the view , the small sum necessary
can never be wanting.

Were it not for some such this check , a pauper would
be sure to go on from appeal to appeal , whether
he had or had not merits : some if he lost each time
he would but be where he was .

A man may be allowed and ought to be allowed
to throw away his own money , but not to throw
away the money of other men .

This principle might perhaps be applied to
appeals on from the immediate Courts : to but I forbore
inserting articles for that purpose in the text , for fear of
burthening the plan too much with details .

Identifier: | JB/051/283/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	051	Main Headings	evidence; procedure code
Folio number	283	Info in main headings field	judic. estab.
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur young
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	16448
Box Contents