★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head>III<gap/>TX. R.S. 5.<lb/> * Voluminousness<lb/> 34.</head> | <head>III<gap/>TX. R.S. 5.<lb/> * Voluminousness<lb/> 34.</head> | ||
<p><del>34. Imprisonment without <hi rend='underline'>Bail or <gap/></hi><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> When <add> the Imprisonment <gap/> is </add>in <hi rend='underline'>Execution</hi>, that repetition of these <lb/><gap/> is unnecessary.</del></p> | <p><del>34. Imprisonment without <hi rend='underline'>Bail or <gap/></hi><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> When <add> the Imprisonment <gap/> is </add>in <hi rend='underline'>Execution</hi>, that repetition of these <lb/><gap/> is unnecessary.</del> <note>Baltolgu</note></p> | ||
<head>35. v. 32.23</head> | |||
<p><note>35. The Stat. 31<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> G.E.c.62.§5 & 6. is an instance of an exquisite piece of confusion generated by the <unclear>former</unclear> method. — It takes up an entire page in describing a Statute which it is <unclear>kinder</unclear> to perpetuate, and when all is done, it so <gap/> it, than <del>any one</del> <add>as one</add> who had not turned to <del>the</del> it Statute itself could concede but that it was two different Statutes that it was describing — the whole thread of the Syntax is so shattered <add>broken</add> by doublings & turnings, that it is <add><unclear>one's own</unclear></add> plainly the writer's head was turned giddy before he came to the end of it.</note> | |||
35.2.23. <hi rend='superscript'>32.</hi> Repealing by <hi rend='underline'>description</hi> & not by <hi rend='underline'>reference</hi> <add>specification<add>numeration</add> </add> to title a practice so common at <lb/>present & so much to be lamented. </p> | |||
IIITX. R.S. 5.
* Voluminousness
34.
34. Imprisonment without Bail or + When the Imprisonment is in Execution, that repetition of these
is unnecessary. Baltolgu
35. v. 32.23
35. The Stat. 31st G.E.c.62.§5 & 6. is an instance of an exquisite piece of confusion generated by the former method. — It takes up an entire page in describing a Statute which it is kinder to perpetuate, and when all is done, it so it, than any one as one who had not turned to the it Statute itself could concede but that it was two different Statutes that it was describing — the whole thread of the Syntax is so shattered broken by doublings & turnings, that it is one's own plainly the writer's head was turned giddy before he came to the end of it.
35.2.23. 32. Repealing by description & not by reference specification<add>numeration </add> to title a practice so common at
present & so much to be lamented.
|
Identifier: | JB/079/039/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
079 |
|||
|
039 |
composition inexplicit the most usual being chosen |
||
|
002 |
voluminousness |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
cc1 |
|||
|
25481 |
|||
