★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/039/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/079/039/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>III<gap/>X R.S. 5.</head>32. - v35. 23. <lb/> <p><note>COMPOS.</note> <lb/>32. Inexplicit Repeals - When a Stat. repeals <del> all he </del> <add> every thing in all precedings </add> Statute made upon the same subject <lb/> contrary to itslef <add> clashing with it </add> either in the whole, or in some past, without specifying which they are.<lb/> <note> It is not for the private compiler to <gap/> upon <gap/> to <gap/> J. </note>The publisher or compiler still confines to print all preceding Statutes, <del> not </del> having it in his <lb/> power to venture to <sic>omitt</sic> any, or even to mark them as repealed. [By] this wretched <sic>practise,</sic> <lb/> which unhappily prevails almost <sic>unviscerally</sic> <add> is alone sufficient to </add> render<del>s</del> the whole Body of Regulation </lb/> on that subject a map of confusion. Shares are spread for the <del><unclear>leader</unclear></del> <add> persons concerned </add> on every side: <lb/> <del> they are compelled to </del> <add> a necessity is imposed upon them of</add> exercising a very difficult judgment at their peril, which the Legislation <lb/>might have saved them from by a line or two. Thousands <del> are perhaps Matters </del> <add> are compelled to do that </del> worth <lb/> danger, which one might have done for them without any </p> <pb/><!-- | <head>III<gap/>X R.S. 5.</head>32. - v35. 23. <lb/> <!-- This section is on a pieceof paper pasted over another --><p><note>COMPOS.</note> <lb/>32. Inexplicit Repeals - When a Stat. repeals <del> all he </del> <add> every thing in all precedings </add> Statute made upon the same subject <lb/> contrary to itslef <add> clashing with it </add> either in the whole, or in some past, without specifying which they are.<lb/> <note> It is not for the private compiler to <gap/> upon <gap/> to <gap/> J. </note>The publisher or compiler still confines to print all preceding Statutes, <del> not </del> having it in his <lb/> power to venture to <sic>omitt</sic> any, or even to mark them as repealed. [By] this wretched <sic>practise,</sic> <lb/> which unhappily prevails almost <sic>unviscerally</sic> <add> is alone sufficient to </add> render<del>s</del> the whole Body of Regulation </lb/> on that subject a map of confusion. Shares are spread for the <del><unclear>leader</unclear></del> <add> persons concerned </add> on every side: <lb/> <del> they are compelled to </del> <add> a necessity is imposed upon them of</add> exercising a very difficult judgment at their peril, which the Legislation <lb/>might have saved them from by a line or two. Thousands <del> are perhaps Matters </del> <add> are compelled to do that </del> worth <lb/> danger, which one might have done for them without any </p> <pb/><p><!-- start of visible text from underlying page -->in force: if this Law continues <sic>encumber'd</sic> with them all. </p> <p><note> -<gap/>, and when all is done, it so describes it, than <del><gap/><gap/></del> <add> as one </add> who had not turned to, <del> the <gap/> </del> Statuteitself could conceive but that it was two different Statutes that it was describing - the whole thread of theSyntax is so shattered <add> broken </add> by doublings & <gap/>, that it is <add> one sees </add> plain by the writers had well turned giddy before he came to the end of it. </note> </p> <p> <head>36</head> <note> 36 </note> By the ----- of G.... the penalties therein specified are directed to be <sic>recover'd</sic> by <del> su</del><add> such</add> <lb/>methods, whereby penalties established by any Excise Laws are <sic>recover'd</sic> - But which are <del>the<del> <add> they ? <add> <lb/>Each unhappy <unclear>trader</unclear> is sent to hunt all over the Statute Book at his peril in order <lb/> to know what <del> one troubl of the </del> the comparer by the trouble of one angle search might <lb/>have told him without any. </p><head>37. v. <add> Heads </add> IV. reg. 43.</head><p> 37. Particular items t be combined <add> included </add> under general <add> generical </add> <hi rend='underline'>popular</hi> expression for the sake <lb/> of notoriety and <gap/> and specified in a clause recommended apart for the <del>sa</del> <add> sake </add> <lb/> of <sic>certainity</sic> of legal <unclear>precision</unclear> - As for example - Extra costs shall be given to <lb/> <add> against <unclear>Petts as</unclear> saith against Prosecutors or Penal Statutes in the went <add> case <del><gap/></del> </add> of "the Sects <del>c</del>easing <add> ing </add> <lb/> "to the disadvantage of such Pett." Now the ways in which they may so cease are <lb/><del> 5</del> <add>6 </add> 2 deposition <add> conclusion </add> J3 (provisional) <add> <hi rend='underline'>c</hi> not definitive <add> conclusive </add> </add><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
IIIX R.S. 5.32. - v35. 23.
COMPOS.
32. Inexplicit Repeals - When a Stat. repeals all he every thing in all precedings Statute made upon the same subject
contrary to itslef clashing with it either in the whole, or in some past, without specifying which they are.
It is not for the private compiler to upon to J. The publisher or compiler still confines to print all preceding Statutes, not having it in his
power to venture to omitt any, or even to mark them as repealed. [By] this wretched practise,
which unhappily prevails almost unviscerally is alone sufficient to renders the whole Body of Regulation </lb/> on that subject a map of confusion. Shares are spread for the leader persons concerned on every side:
they are compelled to a necessity is imposed upon them of exercising a very difficult judgment at their peril, which the Legislation
might have saved them from by a line or two. Thousands are perhaps Matters are compelled to do that worth
danger, which one might have done for them without any
---page break---
in force: if this Law continues encumber'd with them all.
<note> -, and when all is done, it so describes it, than <add> as one who had not turned to, the Statuteitself could conceive but that it was two different Statutes that it was describing - the whole thread of theSyntax is so shattered broken by doublings & , that it is one sees plain by the writers had well turned giddy before he came to the end of it. </note>
36 36 By the ----- of G.... the penalties therein specified are directed to be recover'd by su such
methods, whereby penalties established by any Excise Laws are recover'd - But which are the <add> they ? <add> the comparer by the trouble of one angle search might
Each unhappy trader is sent to hunt all over the Statute Book at his peril in order
to know what one troubl of the
have told him without any.
37. v. Heads IV. reg. 43.
37. Particular items t be combined included under general generical popular expression for the sake
of notoriety and and specified in a clause recommended apart for the sa sake
of certainity of legal precision - As for example - Extra costs shall be given to
against Petts as saith against Prosecutors or Penal Statutes in the went <add> case of "the Sects ceasing ing
"to the disadvantage of such Pett." Now the ways in which they may so cease are
5 6 2 deposition conclusion J3 (provisional) c not definitive <add> conclusive </add>
Identifier: | JB/079/039/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
079 |
|||
039 |
composition inexplicit the most usual being chosen |
||
001 |
voluminousness |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c5 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
cc1 |
|||
25481 |
|||