JB/050/149/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/149/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>CERTAINTY Judgment</head><lb/>-----<lb/>An absurd point of Law respecting this <add><gap/></add> is, that if<lb/><del>the <gap/></del> Judgment <del>there be</del> <add>contain any <del><gap/></del> thing</add> <del><gap/></del> beyond the autho-<lb/>-rity of the Court, instead of being reversed <add>or altered</add> <gap/><lb/>and confirmed as to the rest, it must be reversed<lb/>altogether, & thus [<gap/> de hoc qui?] the offender<lb/>tho' ever so atrocious must go unpunished &#x2014;<lb/>This is a clear power of <add>Pardon</add> exemption in a Judge<lb/>if he thinks proper to use it.<lb/><lb/>Judgment where the punishment is <hi rend='underline'>fixed</hi>, is<lb/>nothing as it were but a <add>a declaration of the Law already existing</add> Warrant: where it<lb/>is <hi rend='underline'>discretionary</hi>, it is an <hi rend='underline'><gap/></hi>. It is a <lb/>modification of the Law: it is within certain <gap/><lb/>& instructions an <add>ex post facto</add> enactment of a new Law, adapted to the particular case.
<head>CERTAINTY Judgment</head>
 
<p>An absurd point of Law respecting this <add>hand</add> is, that if<lb/><del>the <gap/></del> Judgment <del>there be</del> <add>contain any <del>class/del> thing</add> <del>precision</del> beyond the authority<lb/> of the Court, instead of being reversed <add>or altered</add> for taste<lb/>and confirmed as to the rest, it must be reversed<lb/>altogether, &amp; thus [sed de hoc qui?] the offender<lb/>tho' ever so atrocious must go unpunished &#x2014;<lb/>This is a clear power of <add>Pardon</add> exemption in a Judge<lb/>if he thinks proper to use it.<lb/><lb/>Judgment where the punishment is <hi rend='underline'>fixed</hi>, is<lb/>nothing as it were but a <add>a declaration of the Law already existing</add> Warrant: where it<lb/>is <hi rend='underline'>discretionary</hi>, it is an <hi rend='underline'>assurance</hi>. It is a <lb/>modification of the Law: it is within certain <gap/><lb/>&amp; instructions an <add>ex post facto</add> enactment of a new Law, adapted to the particular case.</p>





Revision as of 09:29, 28 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

CERTAINTY Judgment

An absurd point of Law respecting this hand is, that if
the Judgment there be contain any class/del> thing precision beyond the authority
of the Court, instead of being reversed or altered for taste
and confirmed as to the rest, it must be reversed
altogether, & thus [sed de hoc qui?] the offender
tho' ever so atrocious must go unpunished —
This is a clear power of Pardon exemption in a Judge
if he thinks proper to use it.

Judgment where the punishment is fixed, is
nothing as it were but a a declaration of the Law already existing Warrant: where it
is discretionary, it is an assurance. It is a
modification of the Law: it is within certain
& instructions an ex post facto enactment of a new Law, adapted to the particular case.




Identifier: | JB/050/149/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

149

Info in main headings field

certainty judgment

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16140

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in