JB/079/046/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/046/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/046/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/079/046/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>II. &#x2014; Podge (<gap/> strong upon <unclear>tong  </unclear> <lb/>Acts.</head>
 
<p><note>The shortness of a number of sections taken separately might be supposed to be the reason for stringing them together; as if the notion was, that a Statute ought to be of a certain size &#x2014; But this is not</note> It might be supposed, that this variety was occasioned<lb/> by the stringing of <del>several</del> <add>a few</add> short Sections<lb/> to <gap/> as make-weights, to make up together<lb/> a bundle of a decent size: but this <add>it</add> is no such<lb/> thing &#x2014; The Act 3. G. 2. 19. <del>ia a <gap/> <lb/>Acts </del> for 74 Sections <add>of it is a Revenue Act</add>; then comes a <del>two acts</del> <lb/>75<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi>  for perpetuating an Act for the Regulation <lb/>of Attornies;
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 01:52, 29 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

II. — Podge ( strong upon tong
Acts.

The shortness of a number of sections taken separately might be supposed to be the reason for stringing them together; as if the notion was, that a Statute ought to be of a certain size — But this is not It might be supposed, that this variety was occasioned
by the stringing of several a few short Sections
to as make-weights, to make up together
a bundle of a decent size: but this it is no such
thing — The Act 3. G. 2. 19. ia a
Acts
for 74 Sections of it is a Revenue Act; then comes a two acts
75th for perpetuating an Act for the Regulation
of Attornies;

Identifier: | JB/079/046/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

079

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

046

Info in main headings field

happiness and unhappiness - their ingredients

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f6 / / / f9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25488

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in