JB/079/041/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/079/041/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


<head>43. BODY Natural or Politic?</head>  
<head>43. BODY Natural or Politic?</head>  
 
A doubt arises (which by parenthesis <del>took not it's <gap/> but from</del> <add>would not have happened but for</add> a redundancy) whether defr<!-- end of word cut off at edge of page --><lb/>
a person<add> under 2. Geo.2 c.25</add> <del>was</del> <add>is</add> defrauding a Corporation <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> v <unclear>Bamidgton</unclear> - Appendix.</note> &#x2014; It is thought necessary to remove <add>compose</add> it by a legislative <add>new legislative</add><lb/>
provision <add>interpretative for the purpose</add> &#x2014; Where does the reader suppose this provision <add>interpretation</add> is to be met with? <del>At</del> <add>In</add> the<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> 78<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> of a string of long Sections in <add>at the Tail of</add> a Revenue Act.<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>The words which <add>render, or which at least were thought to</add> render the <del>amendment</del> <add>supplement</add> necessary are <add><unclear>or</unclear></add> with intention to defraud any person whatsoever",, [ss1],, <del>Had it stopped at the word "defraud" the </note></del>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:49, 29 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

RS VOLUMINOUSNESS - STYLE. 7

thought in there taken to . — Scarce a Statute but is loaded laden with one or more
instances of the

42. - v. 35.

frequenting [Not that [this violation of the Rules of Grammar] is in any case peculiar to this Statute,
for in a few printed compositions of the age, are grammatical trespasses more frequent
or more gross: not those not Orthography & Concord, which wound a cultivated the ear, but which affect those against Syntax & detail <add>vitiate —</add> the meaning <add>meaning—</add>

43. BODY Natural or Politic? A doubt arises (which by parenthesis took not it's but from would not have happened but for a redundancy) whether defr
a person under 2. Geo.2 c.25 was is defrauding a Corporation + + v Bamidgton - Appendix. — It is thought necessary to remove compose it by a legislative new legislative
provision interpretative for the purpose — Where does the reader suppose this provision interpretation is to be met with? At In the
78th of a string of long Sections in at the Tail of a Revenue Act.+ The words which render, or which at least were thought to render the amendment supplement necessary are or with intention to defraud any person whatsoever",, [ss1],, Had it stopped at the word "defraud" the



Identifier: | JB/079/041/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

Folio number

041

Info in main headings field

composition statute singly qua statute - enacting formulary hodge-podge-ness

Image

001

Titles

voluminousness - style

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

richard smith

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25483

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in