JB/051/285/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/285/002: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
<lb/>
<lb/>
to stop ;
to stop ;
   
   
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>

Revision as of 14:54, 1 October 2012

Click Here To Edit


28-Sept-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.


Where no decision has been given , thee is nothing
to appeal from . But in a criminal matter by the mere forbearance
of giving a decision all the mischief may be done
of the most unjust decision . A criminal may
be screened from the punishment which is his due :
or an innocent person virtually condemned to
perpetual imprisonment . Petitions for expedition
must therefore be equally allowed , where there
is an appeal allowed, and where there is none . Neither
can complaints for be misbehaviour be suppressed
because the succession of appeals is made
to stop ;



Identifier: | JB/051/285/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

285

Info in main headings field

obs.

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16450

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in