JB/051/286/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/286/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/286/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/286/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


01-Oct-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.
<p><note>Appeal  III. <gap/></note><!-- note in pencil -->  and improved all concurr in manifesting the
<lb/>
importance of uniformity .
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indented --><note>Note addition</note>  The consideration of uniformity <add>of decision ,</add> though naturally
<lb/>
connected with that of rectitude of decision
<lb/>
is perfectly distinct from it . Conceive
<lb/>
it a matter of indifference whether a rule of <add>law</add>
<lb/></p>
<pb/>
<head>Note</head><!-- left of centre -->
<p><note>Appeal III . <unclear>Remedite</unclear> . </note><!-- in pencil -->  <del>the remedy they would propose.</del>
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indented -->In England no sooner does a clause in a
<lb/></p>
<pb/>
<head><del><gap/></del>  Addition to <del>n</del>Note (g) to <gap/><!-- symbol -->. 3 .  being the last note</head>
<p><!-- indented -->Private interests would likewise interfere <del><gap/> the decision
<lb/>
on in the business</del> <add>with the decision</add> and shake the probity , or what would
<lb/>
be as bad the reputation for probity of those who were to
<lb/>
give it
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:28, 1 October 2012

Click Here To Edit


01-Oct-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.


Appeal III. and improved all concurr in manifesting the
importance of uniformity .

Note addition The consideration of uniformity of decision , though naturally
connected with that of rectitude of decision
is perfectly distinct from it . Conceive
it a matter of indifference whether a rule of law


---page break---

Note

Appeal III . Remedite . the remedy they would propose.

In England no sooner does a clause in a


---page break---

Addition to nNote (g) to . 3 . being the last note

Private interests would likewise interfere the decision
on in the business
with the decision and shake the probity , or what would
be as bad the reputation for probity of those who were to
give it



Identifier: | JB/051/286/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

5

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

286

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16451

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in