JB/095/004/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/004/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
<p>But the Reader will consider what is here done, as<lb/> done according to the ..... <add>in the views of manners</add> of those Chymists, <lb/>who in analyzing a specimen of a mine of whose<lb/> contents they undertake to give an account, <add>bestow</add> investigate <lb/><add>weigh</add> the several <del>subjects</del> <add>ingredients</add> with <del>their interest</del> <add>a ...</add><lb/> which they never would have <sic>employd</sic> for the sake<lb/> of obtaining, the .... of that single parcel, but for<lb/> the idea <add>judgment</add> that may be obtained from it of the whole. </p>  
<p>But the Reader will consider what is here done, as<lb/> done according to the ..... <add>in the views of manners</add> of those Chymists, <lb/>who in analyzing a specimen of a mine of whose<lb/> contents they undertake to give an account, <add>bestow</add> investigate <lb/><add>weigh</add> the several <del>subjects</del> <add>ingredients</add> with <del>their interest</del> <add>a ...</add><lb/> which they never would have <sic>employd</sic> for the sake<lb/> of obtaining, the .... of that single parcel, but for<lb/> the idea <add>judgment</add> that may be obtained from it of the whole. </p>  


<p>Tis the whole mass therefore of the Statute Law; <lb/>rather than this minute <add>small</add> fragment of it<lb/> that the Reader is to consider as decomposing <lb/>in the observations on the old Draught; &amp; recombining<lb/> in the new one for <add>in</add> which propose <add>design <add>view</add></add> <lb/>a specimen <add><gap/></add> was carefully related to <add>for the</add> operation<lb/> upon: <add>experiment</add> such an one as <del>should contain</del> <add>including a Branch</add> of<lb/> the Law compleat within itself, should contain <lb/>a greater variety of Articles than can be found <add><del>in</del> to be met with</add> <lb/>
<pb/>


supported only by those imperfect presumptions of success as ........ can afford <add>give</add> him<note>an obscure individual can rise to</note> </p>


 
<p>The provisions in this made out to be <gap/><lb/> division of them into previous Substantive &amp; Adjective &#x2014; <lb/>That the <unclear>Erastus Lectio</unclear> is Adjective, is stabilitive <add>constitutive</add> <lb/>of a Const.<lb/> That the series of Adjective (in the Section of Adjective) <lb/>is compleat or meant to be so.  <lb/>An <add>2</add> Adjective provision concerning evidence viz: <lb/>proof in Def.<hi rend='superscript'>n</hi> &amp; View, among the substantives <lb/> Why? </p>
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 02:06, 2 October 2012

Click Here To Edit

Turnp. Act. Prelude

Those observations over which are related principally related
to the particular of thedesign have this relation application to the general,
in that they serve to shew how naturally or &
indeed necessarily in a manner unavoidably errors of every species class flow from a
neglect of that order & correctness which it is the
purpose of the latter to recommend.

[All] the animadversions that are capable of a general application may be ranged under the following
heads viz.
UnReadiness of expression | — — — — — — | — — — —
— — &c — — — |— — — |— — —
— — — — —|
. . . . After the considerable liberal sacrifices of Brevity that have been
made in 3 one6 part 5 to 1 Certainty, & to order in another

The Anatomy of an Act of Parliament — or
rather [to speak] as a Chymist say first decomposed
then recompresended in a new form

The degree of to which I have descended
in laying open the disadvantages is of the
common method old model, & unfolding the reasons of that the spurious
---page break---
in any of those Acts that contain only — few partial
alterations modifications to same and by deferred scattered [& extensive] <add>dismemberd</add> . . . . .
Title.

While I speak of the whole mass however, I would
not be understood as insinuating that the specimen
in question is (for the purpose of exemplifying
the rules of decomposition & composition) to be considered as an a
compleat representative as compleatly represented in itof the it whole: [but only + +(to continue the metaphor) as
serving the record to bring such representative of any that
bring the most
even be made to come off at in one piece
]
It extends throughout the whole, tho' it does not embrace cover the whole include They run through the whole, tho' they do not alone compose it. nor therefore that no other rules will be wanting
for the performing the same operation on any
other part than what result from the manipulations
employ'd exhibited on this: what I mean is, that
it comes the nearest to the being such a representative
of any that can be made exists entire to come off in one piece;
& in consequence will furnish the greatest number
of such rules. To run through the whole
Labyrinth & spread open the whole contents of the so
vast a mine, would were be too mighty a task for one
ill provided with many requisite assistances, and
obscure individual with such imperfect presumptions


---page break---

IV

nor any, proposed in lieu of it indeed is such, as must doubtless appear trifling & very
disproportionate to the subject, and object but were it to be consider'd
as having no application further but merely than to the
particular design. if nothing more in the process were to be consider'd than it's application to the particular design. alone to be consider'd

But the Reader will consider what is here done, as
done according to the ..... in the views of manners of those Chymists,
who in analyzing a specimen of a mine of whose
contents they undertake to give an account, bestow investigate
weigh the several subjects ingredients with their interest a ...
which they never would have employd for the sake
of obtaining, the .... of that single parcel, but for
the idea judgment that may be obtained from it of the whole.

Tis the whole mass therefore of the Statute Law;
rather than this minute small fragment of it
that the Reader is to consider as decomposing
in the observations on the old Draught; & recombining
in the new one for in which propose design <add>view</add>
a specimen was carefully related to for the operation
upon: experiment such an one as should contain including a Branch of
the Law compleat within itself, should contain
a greater variety of Articles than can be found in to be met with

---page break---
supported only by those imperfect presumptions of success as ........ can afford give himan obscure individual can rise to

The provisions in this made out to be
division of them into previous Substantive & Adjective —
That the Erastus Lectio is Adjective, is stabilitive constitutive
of a Const.
That the series of Adjective (in the Section of Adjective)
is compleat or meant to be so.
An 2 Adjective provision concerning evidence viz:
proof in Def.n & View, among the substantives
Why?























































































Identifier: | JB/095/004/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

004

Info in main headings field

turnp. act prelude iv

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30890

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in