JB/051/289/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/289/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/289/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/289/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->2</head>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->Appeals</head>
 
<p><note><!-- in pencil -->VII Curia para</note> 2. One Judge could never possibly suffice to go <add>despatch</add> through<lb/>
all the business that would come before this immediate<lb/>
court and at the same time all the causes<lb/>
that would be brought in the way of appeal from<lb/>
the Parochial or Canton Courts. There must therefore<lb/>
be two Courts <add>separate Judges</add> for the two branches of business. But<lb/>
as the <sic>expence</sic> of two Judges must be incurred, the<lb/>
best way is not to give to them both <add>each of them</add> the business of<lb/>
immediate jurisdiction and the business of appeal in<lb/>
concurrence but to give <add>to</add> one of them the former branch<lb/>
to himself and to the other the latter: for by that<lb/>
means <del>we</del> a cause that has received a decision<lb/>
in the immediate District Court may <add>be made to receive the benefit of</add> undergo a revision<lb/>
without any farther <sic>expence</sic>.</p>





Revision as of 19:15, 7 October 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

2

Appeals

VII Curia para 2. One Judge could never possibly suffice to go despatch through
all the business that would come before this immediate
court and at the same time all the causes
that would be brought in the way of appeal from
the Parochial or Canton Courts. There must therefore
be two Courts separate Judges for the two branches of business. But
as the expence of two Judges must be incurred, the
best way is not to give to them both each of them the business of
immediate jurisdiction and the business of appeal in
concurrence but to give to one of them the former branch
to himself and to the other the latter: for by that
means we a cause that has received a decision
in the immediate District Court may be made to receive the benefit of undergo a revision
without any farther expence.




Identifier: | JB/051/289/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

289

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f11 / f12 / f13 / f14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16454

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in