JB/095/088/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/088/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/095/088/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/095/088/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>-Procedure de L'oline.</head><lb/><p>If any intention of censure <add> intent to censure </add> should be implied from <lb/> the last [<unclear>inch</unclear>] of the <add> tis </add> above expression let none <lb/> of it fall upon that candid &amp; <unclear>practratory</unclear> <add> discerning <unclear>preijeur</unclear> </add> <lb/> hand, which he delineated &amp;c </p> <p> <note> have rated up the position of <unclear>Farmers</unclear>. </note> He as must every man pronounced from what <lb/> he knew. &amp;he knew </p><pb/><!-- start of right hand page --> <p> The following considerations will probably [suffice <lb/> to ] satisfy <add><gap/> </add> - - - person, &amp; <del> all those </del> <add> such others </add> <lb/> whose judgments are guided by neither motives <lb/> that [those of ] the <del> interest </del> <add> prejudices </add> or interests of a <lb/> profession. </p> <p> 1.  The <del>jud</del> trial in this case is <add> or ought <add> may </add> to be </add>carried on in <add> with </add> <lb/> public <add> open doors </add> for I defend it on no other terms </p> <p> 2.  The first trial is not conclusive, but <lb/> that the def<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> [&amp; I wish I could say the <lb/> informer ] has or may <add> ought to </add> have (for once more <lb/> I defend it not but upon this second supposition) <lb/> [<del> a <gap/> </del> <add> upon </add> proper cautions given to put all things <lb/> in case of an <sic>affirmance</sic> in the state they <lb/> would have been in if the original sentance <lb/> had been executed,] a review <add> new trial </add> <add> review of the sentance </add> in a court of <lb/> great resort, <del>the </del> before a <hi rend='underline'>numerous</hi> &amp; <hi rend='underline'>uncertain</hi> <lb/> <hi rend='underline'>bench</hi> of Judges </p> <p> <note> Thus much is provided against incapacity <add> <gap/> mistake </add> </note> <lb/> 3.  <del>And </del> <add> Against artful injustice </add> what is more material &amp; more satisfactory <lb/> <foreign><hi rend='underline'>ad hominum</hi></foreign> than any thing else <add> <hi rend='underline'>either / if</hi> the power considering <lb/> the debt not only might have, but actually <lb/> <note> And what reneders the other <add> former </add> conditions less indispensable than otherwise they would be </note> has in every case whatsoever the <del> norm </del> <add>right of </add> <lb/> bringing in the last resort the conduct of the <lb/> Magistrate under examination <add> the <unclear>sequizaner</unclear></add> by that very <lb/> tribunal, whose supposed exclusion is lamented. </p> <p> Juduicial corruption is not the <hi rend='underline'>habit</hi> <add> constant </add> (desperate <lb/> <note> The ---- of a Jury is a remedy to the corruption of the Magistrate unequal to the power of the patients </note>indeed would <add> it is even </add> be the condition <add> state </add> of the commonwealth) but <lb/> the occasional <del> <gap/> </del> <add> <gap/> </add> this directed remedy, <lb/> <add> too </add> violent <del>&amp; <gap/> </del> &amp; as it is much for a direct <gap/> <lb/> is administered as it ought to be <add> when there is necessity </add> as <add> for </add> purge. </p> <p>If it be justice that is done, it is no matter <lb/> by whom <add> who it is </add> it has been done: no <add> the </add> remedy is wanting <add> not wanted </add> <lb/> for there has been no disease: <del> Why must a </del> <add> Where is the kindness </add> <lb/> of compelling a man at all events to take <lb/> a remedy where there is no disease, often worse <lb/> than the disease wherethere is one ? </p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:51, 9 October 2012

Click Here To Edit

-Procedure de L'oline.

If any intention of censure intent to censure should be implied from
the last [inch] of the tis above expression let none
of it fall upon that candid & practratory discerning preijeur
hand, which he delineated &c

have rated up the position of Farmers. He as must every man pronounced from what
he knew. &he knew


---page break---

The following considerations will probably [suffice
to ] satisfy - - - person, & all those such others
whose judgments are guided by neither motives
that [those of ] the interest prejudices or interests of a
profession.

1. The jud trial in this case is or ought <add> may to be </add>carried on in with
public open doors for I defend it on no other terms

2. The first trial is not conclusive, but
that the deft [& I wish I could say the
informer ] has or may ought to have (for once more
I defend it not but upon this second supposition)
[ a upon proper cautions given to put all things
in case of an affirmance in the state they
would have been in if the original sentance
had been executed,] a review new trial review of the sentance in a court of
great resort, the before a numerous & uncertain
bench of Judges

Thus much is provided against incapacity mistake
3. And Against artful injustice what is more material & more satisfactory
ad hominum than any thing else either / if the power considering
the debt not only might have, but actually
<note> And what reneders the other <add> former
conditions less indispensable than otherwise they would be </note> has in every case whatsoever the norm right of
bringing in the last resort the conduct of the
Magistrate under examination the sequizaner by that very
tribunal, whose supposed exclusion is lamented.

Juduicial corruption is not the habit constant (desperate
The ---- of a Jury is a remedy to the corruption of the Magistrate unequal to the power of the patients indeed would it is even be the condition state of the commonwealth) but
the occasional this directed remedy,
too violent & & as it is much for a direct
is administered as it ought to be when there is necessity as for purge.

If it be justice that is done, it is no matter
by whom who it is it has been done: no the remedy is wanting not wanted
for there has been no disease: Why must a Where is the kindness
of compelling a man at all events to take
a remedy where there is no disease, often worse
than the disease wherethere is one ?


Identifier: | JB/095/088/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

088

Info in main headings field

procedure de l'ordre

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30974

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in