JB/050/131/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:54, 10 October 2012

CERTAINTY - APPEAL

It is a topic of Eulogism on this Law among
popular speculators, that no man can hereby
be put so much as to answer to a much less to
a capital charge: without the finding of a Jury the same persons, without
making the collation, would probably be a many
The foremost to state eulogize also the Law of
Appeals; yet when this comes to be performed one
or other must necessarily be given up: for
by an Appeal of Felony without the intervention of any
Jury, and without an Oath any man may be kept with a halter
about his neck by any other man for months
or perhaps for years: and all this without the
least possibility or intention of bringing proof which
is not called for till at the Trial. ||
|| Qu however, whether here real 15 be securam" must not be given.

Identifier: \| JB/050/131/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	050	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	131	Info in main headings field	certainty - appeal
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	16122
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>CERTAINTY - APPEAL</head><lb/><p> Itis a topic of <unclear>Eulogism</unclear> on this Law <gap/><lb/> popular speculators, that no man can hereby <lb/>be put <add> so muchas </add> to answer to a <gap/> much less to <lb/> a capital charge: <add> without the finding of a Jury </add> the same persons, without <lb/>making the collation, would probably be a many <lb/>The foremost to <del> stay </del> <add> eulogize </add> also the Law of <lb/> Appeals; yet when this comes to be performed one <lb/>or other must <gap/> be given up: for <lb/> by an Appeal <add> of Felony </add> without the intervention of any <lb/> Jury, <add> and without an Oath </add> any man may be kept with a halter <lb/> abut his neck by any other man for months <lb/> or perhaps fo years: and all this without the <lb/> least possibility or intention of bringing proof which <lb/>is not called for <sic>till</sic> at the Trial. || <note> || Qu however, whether have real 15 <gap/><gap/>" must not be given.</note> </p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<head>CERTAINTY - APPEAL</head><lb/><p> It is a topic of Eulogism on this Law among<lb/> popular speculators, that no man can hereby <lb/>be put <add> so much as </add> to answer to a <gap/> much less to <lb/> a capital charge: <add> without the finding of a Jury </add> the same persons, without <lb/>making the collation, would probably be <unclear>a many</unclear> <lb/>The foremost to <del> state </del> <add> eulogize </add> also the Law of <lb/> Appeals; yet when this comes to be performed one <lb/>or other must necessarily be given up: for <lb/> by an Appeal <add> of Felony </add> without the intervention of any <lb/> Jury, <add> and without an Oath </add> any man may be kept with a halter <lb/> about his neck by any other man for months <lb/> or perhaps for years: and all this without the <lb/> least possibility or intention of bringing proof which <lb/>is not called for <sic>till</sic> at the Trial. || <lb/><note> || Qu however, whether here real 15 <gap/> be <foreign>securam</foreign>" must not be given.</note> </p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Views

JB/050/131/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:54, 10 October 2012

Navigation

Search