JB/050/139/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/050/139/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/139/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/139/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>INDICTMENTS.</head><lb/> <p> <note> The doctrine of Indictments a conspiracy against Common Sense. </note> I never can look into the doctrine of Indictments without repeated <add> recurring </add> indig<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi>nation &amp; <gap/> <add> concern <hi rend='superscript'>1</hi> </add> - <unclear>indignant</unclear> <lb/>at the contued <add> perpetual </add> insult which it gives to the common Sense of every Englishman, bringing <lb/> <note> Indictments should be so drawn as that a person knowing the Law on that behalf may have to say if this be true the accused cannot but be guilty. (add> of some one crime <add> as <gap/> </add> specified by the Law </add><add> this means under <gap/><gap/> in what is said under Definitions p.1. qu.v. </add>  And that the accused may be appraised of all those circumstances which it would be natural for him to dispute - Every <gap/> beyond this is frivolous &amp; mischievious.  These principles therefroe will draw the Line between such objections to the forms of Indictments as should be mentioned, &amp; such as should be repulsed.</note>the Law into general &amp; <add> so far as itregards that matter </add> well - <unclear>mented</unclear> contempt: sorrow <add> concern for </add> <del>at </del> the unhappy race of suffering <gap/><lb/> which I imagine &amp; <unclear>see</unclear> springing up under the shadow of that doctrine, invited <add> to all <unclear>villainers</unclear> by the prospect <lb/> of impunity - The intelligence of this weakness of the Law is too interesting to all <add> who mean to be </add>  <gap/> <add> to </add> <lb/> escape them; interest <add> a pressing &amp; <unclear>obvious</unclear> </add> instructing men in certain <gap/> who are instructed in no others:<lb/> They know not indeed previously from what quarter <del> will </del> that cloud will arise which is to <lb/> <gap/> them from <add> forwever or for a time </add> the [eye] <add> sword </add> of Justice: but they know <add> it is suffered not <del> what </del> </add> ,del> that </del> it may  arise:  they know <add> how</add> <del> L </del><lb/> often it will obey the spell of a Golden Talisman: and that <del> many </del> <add> if </add>  distinction <unclear>has</unclear><lb/> <note> <add> Warned </add> <gap/> <del> at </del> <add> by </add> the <unclear>Chink</unclear> - reason takes her Flight from the Judgment Seat:</note> <add> indeed </add> overtaken most of their predecessors, multitudes is of them have died not because they <lb/> <note>Jargon reigns triumphant [ &amp; alone] &amp; enjoys the <add>success of </add> <add> <gap/> in </add>the succession of offerings whihc follow each other often than many a dull hour </note> </note>were guilty, but because they were poor -Senseless indeed must be that argument <lb/> which urged with gravity <&amp; confidence </add> by the Advocate, &amp; embellished by a few apposite aphorisms <lb/> on the topic of Humanity , will not procure a delay from Judges, <del><gap/></del> compelled by <lb/> precedent &amp; accustomed by Habit to pay < daily </add> attendtion to <add> formal</add> objections <add> in matter os Law </add> the most frivolous &amp; the <lb/> most foreign to the merits of the point in question.</p> <p><note> Whenforms of ndictment are thus <lb/> reduced to a certainty thy may be <lb/> printed leaving nalnks for the <lb/> particular specification. </note> </p> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:52, 15 October 2012

Click Here To Edit

INDICTMENTS.

The doctrine of Indictments a conspiracy against Common Sense. I never can look into the doctrine of Indictments without repeated recurring indig2nation & concern 1 - indignant
at the contued perpetual insult which it gives to the common Sense of every Englishman, bringing
Indictments should be so drawn as that a person knowing the Law on that behalf may have to say if this be true the accused cannot but be guilty. (add> of some one crime as specified by the Law </add> this means under in what is said under Definitions p.1. qu.v. And that the accused may be appraised of all those circumstances which it would be natural for him to dispute - Every beyond this is frivolous & mischievious. These principles therefroe will draw the Line between such objections to the forms of Indictments as should be mentioned, & such as should be repulsed.the Law into general & so far as itregards that matter well - mented contempt: sorrow concern for at the unhappy race of suffering
which I imagine & see springing up under the shadow of that doctrine, invited to all villainers by the prospect
of impunity - The intelligence of this weakness of the Law is too interesting to all <add> who mean to be
to
escape them; interest a pressing & obvious instructing men in certain who are instructed in no others:
They know not indeed previously from what quarter will that cloud will arise which is to
them from forwever or for a time the [eye] sword of Justice: but they know it is suffered not what ,del> that it may arise: they know how L
often it will obey the spell of a Golden Talisman: and that many if distinction has
Warned at by the Chink - reason takes her Flight from the Judgment Seat: indeed overtaken most of their predecessors, multitudes is of them have died not because they
Jargon reigns triumphant [ & alone] & enjoys the success of in the succession of offerings whihc follow each other often than many a dull hour </note>were guilty, but because they were poor -Senseless indeed must be that argument
which urged with gravity <& confidence </add> by the Advocate, & embellished by a few apposite aphorisms
on the topic of Humanity , will not procure a delay from Judges, compelled by
precedent & accustomed by Habit to pay < daily </add> attendtion to formal objections in matter os Law the most frivolous & the
most foreign to the merits of the point in question.

Whenforms of ndictment are thus
reduced to a certainty thy may be
printed leaving nalnks for the
particular specification.


Identifier: | JB/050/139/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

139

Info in main headings field

indictments

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16130

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in