JB/095/053/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/053/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
into discussions.</p><!-- Line across page -->
into discussions.</p><!-- Line across page -->


<p>Sometimes <add>In certain</add> the disjunction particle [or] is but<lb/>
a continuation of the <add>a prior</add> <hi rend='underline'>conjunction</hi> formed <add>expressed</add> by<lb/>
the conjunctive [and] <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> 
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> instance ss13 after Waggons.</note> &#x2014; In such cases,<lb/>
it was necessary in order to give a right Idea of<lb/>
the matter to represent &amp; this I have accordingly<lb/>
done the words as coupled by the conjunction<lb/>
<unclear>copulative</unclear> in both instances</p><!-- Line across page -->


<p><note>Shall and may</note> I am not ignorant that in cases characterized<lb/>
by the vague description of cases [where the public <add>of <gap/> <gap/></add><lb/>
<note><gap/> in .. 1 <unclear>Burns</unclear> Introd.</note> <hi rend='underline'>may</hi> <add>justice of the</add> has been deemed <add>adjudged</add> to mean the same as "<sic>shalls</sic>"<lb/>
&amp; that on that authority it may be thought necessary<lb/>
when it is meant that <add><gap/></add> persons <add>in <unclear>question</unclear></add> concerned<lb/><!-- line across page -->
should use<del>d</del> their own discretion, <add>special</add> words<lb/>
expressive of such a meaning may be necessary:<lb/>
but</p><!-- Line across page -->


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:49, 18 October 2012

Click Here To Edit

Battologies As to the single clauses that in or words that are standing
singly without any related clauses to match them clauses which match not with one another
with nor with any others, + + clauses which become are redundant as occupying a place not that was already filled by some other, but that had no occasion to be filled at all. as no utility could
therefore result from exhibiting them in a
synoptic , and as their inability must of each case
result from appears no otherwise than by comparison of it with it's context,
I have contented myself with in the
Table Column denominated named <add>entitl'd</add> from them to refer to them
in the Text.

The inserting them and them would draw one
into discussions.

Sometimes In certain the disjunction particle [or] is but
a continuation of the a prior conjunction formed expressed by
the conjunctive [and] + + instance ss13 after Waggons. — In such cases,
it was necessary in order to give a right Idea of
the matter to represent & this I have accordingly
done the words as coupled by the conjunction
copulative in both instances

Shall and may I am not ignorant that in cases characterized
by the vague description of cases [where the public of
in .. 1 Burns Introd. may justice of the has been deemed adjudged to mean the same as "shalls"
& that on that authority it may be thought necessary
when it is meant that persons in question concerned
should used their own discretion, special words
expressive of such a meaning may be necessary:
but



Identifier: | JB/095/053/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

053

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30939

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in