JB/095/053/001

Click Here To Edit

Battologies

As to the single clauses that in or words that are standing
singly without any related clauses to match them clauses which match not with one another
with nor with any others, + + clauses which become are redundant as occupying a place not that was already filled by some other, but that had no occasion to be filled at all. as no utility could
therefore result from exhibiting them in a
synoptic case, and as their inability must of each case
result from appears no otherwise than by comparison of it with it's context,
I have contented myself with in the
Table Column denominated named <add>entitl'd</add> from them to refer to them
in the Text.

The inserting them and them would draw one
into discussions.

Sometimes In certain the disjunction particle [or] is but
a continuation of the a prior conjunction formed expressed by
the conjunctive [and] ╪ ╪ instance §13 after Waggons. — In such cases,
it was necessary in order to give a right Idea of
the matter to represent & this I have accordingly
done the words as coupled by the conjunction
copulative in both instances

Shall and may I am not ignorant that in cases characterized
by the vague description of cases [where the public of
in .. 1 Burns Introd. may justice of the has been deemed adjudged to mean the same as "shalls"
& that on that authority it may be thought necessary

---page break---
when it is meant that the persons in question concerned
should used their own discretion, special words
expressive of such a meaning may be necessary:
but

- - - - - - - - - -
The instance of the words Phrase Penalty & Forfeiture
will make this clear serve to explain my meaning:

The instance where of the very same pair of words
[Forfeiture & Penalty] has been ranked placed in both these at different
times in a diff under a different one class of these 3 classes
will serve to explain my meaning

The ordinary and proper relation which these words
bear to one another is such, that the 1st
is a species of the 2d. & thus accordingly are they
used at least thus they may be understood in
the 11th & 15th Sections

In the 15 & 38th it is otherwise — for the only species
sort of penalty that can be subject of a "recovery"
is such an one in as consists in the loss of an
article of property: in which sense it is precisely synonymous
to Forfeiture

---page break---

Verbosity is by {Periphrasis
{Redundance which is by {Tautology which is by
{Battology
{in by Coincidence
{ by {Specification
{Citra-extension

PAGE & LINE. MEM. As these Tables will not be fit to reform
printed till after the Text, they may refer to
the page & line of it

NUMBER Words differing only in number are reckoned as one the same
The variances by Number are not noticed. no notice is taken of

The upper figure or Numerator
The lower under figure or Denominator

---page break---

Passages where Carts alone appear to be understood. meant

CITra extension It is to be observed that the latitude of the import
may go on from the one word to the other in the track either in increase or in diminution

The argument may proceed as the phrase
is a majori ad minus

PEriphrasis. One species [Logical as it may be termed] of Periphrasis
is the putting the species instead
of the genus.

Identifier: | JB/095/053/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	095	Main Headings
Folio number	053	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	30939
Box Contents