JB/100/099/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/100/099/003: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


3<lb/><head>Compensation Axioms</head><lb/><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> From p. 2<lb/><del>If it were</del> To <sic>admitt</sic> of the quantity of a mans<lb/>fortune <gap/> <gap/> <add>To establish the</add> circumstance of fortune <del>among the</del> <add>as a</add><lb/>circumstance<del>s</del> constitutive of a title [in a dispute<lb/>between two men concerning [the possession of] <gap/> are<lb/><gap/> of property <add>value</add> <del>would be</del> that is so as to adjudge<lb/>the thing in competition always to the poorer would<lb/>be in effect to <del>establish a community of goods and</del> abolish property altogether.<lb/>
3<lb/><head>Compensation Axioms</head><lb/><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> From p. 2<lb/><del>If it were</del> To <sic>admitt</sic> of the quantity of a mans<lb/>fortune <gap/> <gap/> <add>To establish the</add> circumstance of fortune <del>among the</del> <add>as a</add><lb/>circumstance<del>s</del> constitutive of a title [in a dispute<lb/>between two men concerning [the possession of] <gap/> are<lb/><gap/> of property <add>value</add> <del>would be</del> that is so as to adjudge<lb/>the thing in competition always to the poorer would<lb/>be in effect to <del>establish a community of goods and</del> abolish property altogether.<lb/><del>Thereby</del> This would be more adverse to utility than any<lb/>other mode of settling <gap/> that could be devised.<lb/>A man could <add>never</add> hope to enjoy any article any longer<lb/>than till a man poorer than himself should come<lb/>to claim it from him. As no man could at this<lb/>rate be sure of enjoying any thing for two mo-<lb/>-ments together <gap/> no man would give himnself<lb/>the trouble to improve any thing by his labour.<lb/>All men would live from hand to mouth: so that this<lb/>rule <del>instead of</del> would no otherwise favour the poor<lb/>than by <del>reducing all men to poverty in the <gap/></del><lb/><del><gap/>.</del> [establishing and perpetuating [their] poverty.]<lb/><add>rendering their</add> making poverty extreme and universal.<lb/><lb/><del>In</del> A thing therefore can not with any ad-<lb/>-vantage be taken from a richer man to give to<lb/>a poorer, merely on the ground of that difference<lb/>intheir circumstances. But if on any account<lb/>it becomes necessary that <del>any</del> things to a certain<lb/>value should be taken away from one or others<lb/>or both of them, it is right that this newly ac-<lb/>-cruing burthen should be <gap/> as them in propor-<lb/>-tion to their fortunes. For this <add>+</add> will not destroy the title<lb/><add>+</add><note>arrangement will<lb/>leave in possession of<lb/>the two taken together<lb/>more happiness than any<lb/>other arrangement that<lb/>could be developed, and</note><lb/>of either of them to the residue of their fortunes.





Revision as of 20:27, 24 October 2012

Click Here To Edit

3
Compensation Axioms
+ From p. 2
If it were To admitt of the quantity of a mans
fortune To establish the circumstance of fortune among the as a
circumstances constitutive of a title [in a dispute
between two men concerning [the possession of] are
of property value would be that is so as to adjudge
the thing in competition always to the poorer would
be in effect to establish a community of goods and abolish property altogether.
Thereby This would be more adverse to utility than any
other mode of settling that could be devised.
A man could never hope to enjoy any article any longer
than till a man poorer than himself should come
to claim it from him. As no man could at this
rate be sure of enjoying any thing for two mo-
-ments together no man would give himnself
the trouble to improve any thing by his labour.
All men would live from hand to mouth: so that this
rule instead of would no otherwise favour the poor
than by reducing all men to poverty in the
. [establishing and perpetuating [their] poverty.]
rendering their making poverty extreme and universal.

In A thing therefore can not with any ad-
-vantage be taken from a richer man to give to
a poorer, merely on the ground of that difference
intheir circumstances. But if on any account
it becomes necessary that any things to a certain
value should be taken away from one or others
or both of them, it is right that this newly ac-
-cruing burthen should be as them in propor-
-tion to their fortunes. For this + will not destroy the title
+arrangement will
leave in possession of
the two taken together
more happiness than any
other arrangement that
could be developed, and

of either of them to the residue of their fortunes.




Identifier: | JB/100/099/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

100

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

099

Info in main headings field

compensation axioms

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / e2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

32115

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in