★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- There are pencil notes and scribbles at the top of this page, as well as in the margins --> | <!-- There are pencil notes and scribbles at the top of this page, as well as in the margins --> | ||
<p>Think not, my Lord <unclear>that </unclear>for the <unclear>progress </unclear>of <lb/>this or any <unclear>other </unclear>argument I mean to confound <lb/>what it is but too <del><gap/></del> natural <unclear>common </unclear><lb/>to confound in legal arguments <gap/> 10 <add><unclear>unhappily </unclear></add>distinct <lb/>as <gap/> of <gap/> and <gap/>: <del>abstract <gap/> and </del> <add>that which <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </add><lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>must command</unclear> in <gap/> and that which is <add>actually </add> <gap/> <lb/><del>actually <gap/> <unclear>law </unclear> </del> <lb/> in Law. <del><gap/> <gap/> </del> No, my Lord: how <add><gap/> <gap/> </add>wide the distinction<lb/> is but | <p>Think not, my Lord <unclear>that </unclear>for the <unclear>progress </unclear>of <lb/>this or any <unclear>other </unclear>argument I mean to confound <lb/>what it is but too <del><gap/></del> natural <unclear>common </unclear><lb/>to confound in legal arguments <gap/> 10 <add><unclear>unhappily </unclear></add>distinct <lb/>as <gap/> of <gap/> and <gap/>: <del>abstract <gap/> and </del> <add>that which <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> </add><lb/> <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>must command</unclear> in <gap/> and that which is <add>actually </add> <gap/> <lb/><del>actually <gap/> <unclear>law </unclear> </del> <lb/> in Law. <del><gap/> <gap/> </del> No, my Lord: how <add><gap/> <gap/> </add>wide the distinction<lb/> is but too wide known to one What I <lb/> mean to say is that <gap/> <gap/> occasion, as <del><gap/> </del>on <lb/>questionably on many occasions, so it happens that what <lb/> is consonant to ability is also — nay (and <gap/> <lb/> I <del><gap/> </del><gap/> <add><gap/> </add>to <gap/> <gap/> to <unclear>any</unclear>) and for that <gap/> <gap/> <lb/>is <unclear>consonant </unclear>to <gap/>. <gap/> <del><gap/></del> foundation of this <lb/><add>happily</add> must <gap/> <gap/> as <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>repugnant </unclear> to the <lb/><unclear>known</unclear>, fundamental established law of the land <lb/> <gap/> it is to good faith, <unclear>humanity</unclear>, justice. It <lb/>would have <unclear>been </unclear>so, <unclear>had </unclear> <add><gap/> </add>the <gap/> had a constitution <lb/> <add>and </add> <gap/> constitution given to it <gap/> with <gap/> consent <lb/>of the <unclear>unlimited </unclear> <gap/>. <gap/> Lordship has <gap/> <gap/> <lb/><unclear>some</unclear> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><gap/><gap/>my Lord <gap/><lb/>How much more <add><gap/> </add>so under a <gap/> constitution formed <lb/> <gap/> <unclear>this </unclear> <gap/> without this consent: formed <del>for the </del> <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> for the very <gap/> of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> a universal and <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>. <lb/>But it is <gap/> for <gap/> to be <gap/>, <gap/> <gap/> <lb/><gap/> <add><gap/> <unclear>heard </unclear> to </add> speak for <unclear>me </unclear> and <gap/> Lord <gap/> speak for <lb/><unclear>Magna Charta</unclear>,</p> | ||
</p> | |||
Think not, my Lord that for the progress of
this or any other argument I mean to confound
what it is but too natural common
to confound in legal arguments 10 unhappily distinct
as of and : abstract and that which
must command in and that which is actually
actually law
in Law. No, my Lord: how wide the distinction
is but too wide known to one What I
mean to say is that occasion, as on
questionably on many occasions, so it happens that what
is consonant to ability is also — nay (and
I to to any) and for that
is consonant to . foundation of this
happily must as repugnant to the
known, fundamental established law of the land
it is to good faith, humanity, justice. It
would have been so, had the had a constitution
and constitution given to it with consent
of the unlimited . Lordship has
some my Lord
How much more so under a constitution formed
this without this consent: formed for the
for the very of
a universal and .
But it is for to be ,
heard to speak for me and Lord speak for
Magna Charta,
|
Identifier: | JB/116/175/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-07-14 |
[[marginal_summary_numbering::8 [or] 43]] |
||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
175 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f30 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
37708 |
|||
