JB/116/173/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/173/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


<head>2<!-- aligned to the right-hand margin, and in pencil --><note>IV . Samples  Drunkenness  5</note></head><!-- note in pencil -->
<head>2<!-- aligned to the right-hand margin, and in pencil --><note>IV . Samples  Drunkenness  5</note></head><!-- note in pencil -->
<p><!-- indented -->Thus far Captain Collins ,  What status me on the
<p><!-- indented -->Thus far Captain Collins ,  What status me on the
<lb/>
<lb/>
Line 37: Line 38:
got , he might go boldly with it to the gin shop keeper   
got , he might go boldly with it to the gin shop keeper   
<lb/>
<lb/>
who would then have the capital to go on upon , as above.
who would then have <unclear>the</unclear><!-- or, 'a' --> capital to go on upon , as above.
 
<lb/></p>
 
 
 


<p><!-- indented -->The simple way <add>course</add> I still think , would have been
<lb/>
to <add>have</add> prevented the existence of the <del>p</del> prison by <del>stopping</del> <add>preventing</add>
<lb/>
as well the introduction as the fabrication of it .  If <del>both</del> <add>both</add>
<lb/>
could not be prevented or if neither could , <add>by</add> what <del>could</del>
<lb/>
others course could the matter be mended ?  So much
<lb/>
no existed , so much would be drink : more could not
<lb/>
be ; and being drunk , what mattered it by whom
<lb/>
drank or by whom sold?  by a sinning publican ,
<lb/>
or by a publican who was not a sinner ?
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>



Revision as of 23:48, 28 October 2012

Click Here To Edit


28-Oct-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.

13 July 1802 8 N. S. Wales Conduct

2IV . Samples Drunkenness 5

Thus far Captain Collins , What status me on the
subject , is — that probable effect of this new law is
the introducing into the in question certain formalities ,
or perhaps in instances or of
with which it would not have been incumbered otherwise : but
how the greater consumption should be lessened by any such means is more than I can . The owner of the grain would sell it to the Gin-shop pub keeper
for the money : and In would have the
money to give for the . Which That the money should be particularly of the very
first goodness
good would not on this such an occasion be absolutely altogether necessary .
If the gin shop-keeper could not command capital enough ,
in the shape of any thing called money , for this ceremony , the
would then have to sell the grain to somebody
else in the first instance , in order to get the money - which
got , he might go boldly with it to the gin shop keeper
who would then have the capital to go on upon , as above.

The simple way course I still think , would have been
to have prevented the existence of the p prison by stopping preventing
as well the introduction as the fabrication of it . If both both
could not be prevented or if neither could , by what could
others course could the matter be mended ? So much
no existed , so much would be drink : more could not
be ; and being drunk , what mattered it by whom
drank or by whom sold? by a sinning publican ,
or by a publican who was not a sinner ?




Identifier: | JB/116/173/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

173

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37706

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in