★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
29-Oct-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend. | |||
<head>13 July 1802<!-- aligned to the left-hand margin --> <!-- white space --> 8<!-- aligned to the right-hand margin --></head><!-- all in pencil --> | <head>13 July 1802<!-- aligned to the left-hand margin --> <!-- white space --> 8<!-- aligned to the right-hand margin --></head><!-- all in pencil --> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<del>subject , is — that</del> probable effect of this new law is | <del>subject , is — that</del> probable effect of this new law is | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
the introducing into the <gap/> in question certain formalities , | the introducing into the <gap/><!-- 'traf.ick' --> in question certain formalities , | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
or perhaps in some instances or < | or perhaps in some instances or sort of <unclear>curiosity</unclear> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
with which it would not have been incumbered otherwise : but | with which it would not have been incumbered otherwise : but | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<add>how the <del>greater</del> consumption should be lessened by any such means is more than I can | <add>how the <del>greater</del> consumption should be lessened by any such means is more than I can see.</add> The owner of the grain would sell it to the <del><gap/></del> <add>Gin-shop keeper</add> pub | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del> | <del>-lican</del> for <add><del>the</del></add> money : <del>and <gap/><!-- 'instate tis' --></del> <add><del><gap/> <gap/></del><!-- 'was', or 'war' <gap/> ? --></add> In would <del>give</del> <add>have</add> the | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
money <add>to give</add> for the | money <add>to give</add> for the gin . <add>Which <gap/></add> That the money should be <del>particularly</del> <add>of the very | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
first goodness</add> <del>good</del> would not on <del>this</del> <add>such an</add> occasion be <del>absolutely</del> <add>altogether</add> necessary . | first goodness</add> <del>good</del> would not on <del>this</del> <add>such an</add> occasion be <del>absolutely</del> <add>altogether</add> necessary . | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
If the gin shop-keeper could not command capital enough , | If the gin shop-keeper could not command capital enough , | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
in the shape <gap/><!-- addition from beneath ? --> of any thing called money , for this ceremony , the | in the shape <gap/><!-- symbol or addition from beneath ? --> of any thing called money , for this ceremony , the | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<gap/> would then have to sell the grain to somebody | <gap/> would then have to sell the grain to somebody | ||
29-Oct-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.
13 July 1802 8 N. S. Wales Conduct
2IV . Samples Drunkenness 5
Thus far Captain Collins , What status me on the
subject , is — that probable effect of this new law is
the introducing into the in question certain formalities ,
or perhaps in some instances or sort of curiosity
with which it would not have been incumbered otherwise : but
how the greater consumption should be lessened by any such means is more than I can see. The owner of the grain would sell it to the Gin-shop keeper pub
-lican for the money : and In would give have the
money to give for the gin . Which That the money should be particularly of the very
first goodness good would not on this such an occasion be absolutely altogether necessary .
If the gin shop-keeper could not command capital enough ,
in the shape of any thing called money , for this ceremony , the
would then have to sell the grain to somebody
else in the first instance , in order to get the money - which
got , he might go boldly with it to the gin shop keeper
who would then have the capital to go on upon , as above.
The simple way course I still think , would have been
to have prevented the existence of the p prison by stopping preventing
as well the introduction as the fabrication of it . If both both
could not be prevented or if neither could , by what could
others course could the matter be mended ? So much
no existed , so much would be drink : more could not
be ; and being drunk , what mattered it by whom
drank or by whom sold? by a sinning publican ,
or by a publican who was not a sinner ?
|
Identifier: | JB/116/173/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-07-13 |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
173 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d8 / e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
37706 |
|||
