JB/095/091/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/095/091/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 61: Line 61:




<head>NOTE A</head>
<note>fixed rules</note><lb/>
<note>habit of reasoning should <unclear>run</unclear> in the <unclear>same</unclear> track</note>
Why this <del><hi rend='underline'>fixed rules</hi> of the common Law should</del><lb/>
have consider'd only that sort of interest which <gap/><lb/>
<del>from the</del> <del><gap/></del> <del><add>concupiscible</add> appetite</del> exclusive nature of the<lb/>
concupiscible appetite should have governed the <hi rend='underline'>fixed</hi><lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>rules</hi> of the Common Law may be accounted for<lb/>
in a more satisfactory manner by the consideration <add>considering</add><lb/>
that <add>it is</add> the concupiscible only &amp; not the<lb/>
irascible <add>that</add> has any external evidence <add>index <add>symptom</add> <add>proof</add> <add>manifestation</add></add> of it's existence &amp; measure of it's degree, <add>I mean</add> viz: the Sum<lb/>
that may be gained;


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:27, 2 November 2012

Click Here To Edit

PROCEDURE Evidence

The execution of a Law depends upon the
union conjunction of these 2 things in the same person or in the same set of persons necessary to minister to the it's execution of a Law
Interest Motive and Power: [meaning by Interest, not
merely a pecuniary one, but any thing principle whether
referable to the concupiscible appetite or the irascible
that can be depended upon for it's acting
as a motive upon men in their individual . the majority of mankind.]
[We may often observe great pains taken by the
Statute Law to create one to bring about the case
wherein the Common Law has taken away the
other]

At the same time that When therefore we observe <add>If this be true</add> the Statute Law takes while it gives one,
may suffering very patiently the Common Law to take
away the other, we need not wonder to see a still greater (debility
the consequence of it's efforts] so often as
we do the parade of effort, and debility and debility
the consequence. That Interest is to be reputed for as to the competency, which arises only upon the supposition of the natural guilt of the "acc"used. ex gr. the general interest in the enforcement of a Law.

having uppermost and anger command With what degree of propriety the founders of our
the prevailing System of evidence have acted, in confirming rigorously attacking
the consequence of incompetency to that sort
of interest which [has it's] roots [in] arises out of the concupiscible
appetite, in disregard to the exclusion of the irascible whence the origin of the distinction exclusion in


---page break---

in the breasts of those who formed it, whether,
(as men have no surer mode of judging of the sentiments
of others more obvious of than by analogy to their own, And even here to the case where the gratification of that appetite is either near or certain ) from the habit
of having here uppermost, and anger at command,
it is not my present business to enquire: this at
least will be granted, that any no means of uniting promoting the
union between the 2 desiderata postulations beforementioned ought ever to be omitted, that is consistent with
the reigning system principles received that is received, ought ever to be omitted.

Accordingly, when as a help to its execution
the Law gives a new Interest where more than there was
before, it may at least contrive not to take drive
away a power not accompanied by a defect of power out as it were by means of that very interest which of that power which together gives
with a certain tho' weaker & more variable degree of interest
subsisted already in the subject

To come more to particulars, a Law which
gives promises a man a reward for in order that he
may have an interest, that in some cases he might there may have an interest where there would be none otherwise should at least permit him to
wave the reward that when he has an interest , [+] in the large sense of the word he may always have
the power.

A Law of that kind which the law regards not deems not no destruction exclusion of competency which gives a reward to an informer
in order to engage 2 men by the ties of interest in to
it's service perform one out of the 2 different parts of informer
and evidence for it's service, should permitt him
to waive it when there is but one man to
perform both. & that one man already engaged
of himself by other tyes. — by motives by which


---page break---


NOTE A fixed rules
habit of reasoning should run in the same track Why this fixed rules of the common Law should
have consider'd only that sort of interest which
from the concupiscible appetite exclusive nature of the
concupiscible appetite should have governed the fixed
rules of the Common Law may be accounted for
in a more satisfactory manner by the consideration considering
that it is the concupiscible only & not the
irascible that has any external evidence index <add>symptom proof manifestation</add> of it's existence & measure of it's degree, I mean viz: the Sum
that may be gained;



Identifier: | JB/095/091/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

091

Info in main headings field

procedure evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30977

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in