JB/070/035/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/035/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><note>See Ms v. 23.</note> The unhappiness <del><add>about the Law</add></del> that may be seen to flow from<lb/>
judicial decisions <note>which the Law is seen to leave behind it in its course</note> proceeds from two causes:<lb/>
1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> from their losing sight of the principle<lb/>
of Utility altogether: 2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> From<lb/>
the obligation they were in of sacrificing<lb/>
private utility to the public.<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>+ in many cases where the two utilities were not in their nature <sic>irreconciliable</sic>.</note> <del>This</del> an<lb/>
obligation that was laid upon them by the<lb/>
limits of their powers.</p>
 
<p>There were two ways to have remedied this bitter<lb/>
head of inconvenience. The one was, by<lb/>
an intermixture of the judicial and legislative<lb/>
authorities in one person or set of<lb/>
persons: the other by establishing a <del>more</del> <add>stricter</add><lb/>
<del><gap/> <add><gap/></add></del> <add>&amp; more ready</add> intercourse than what has yet<lb/>
subsisted between those two powers<lb/>
<del>when</del> lodged <add>as they have <sic>allways</sic> been</add> in different hands.</p>
 
<p>In all those cases where the utility of<lb/>
the decision <del>between <gap/></del> <add>as applied to the individual case in question</add> stands opposed</p>
 
<pb/>


<!-- upper right quadrant -->




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 21:29, 6 November 2012

Click Here To Edit

See Ms v. 23. The unhappiness about the Law that may be seen to flow from
judicial decisions which the Law is seen to leave behind it in its course proceeds from two causes:
1st from their losing sight of the principle
of Utility altogether: 2dly From
the obligation they were in of sacrificing
private utility to the public.+ + in many cases where the two utilities were not in their nature irreconciliable. This an
obligation that was laid upon them by the
limits of their powers.

There were two ways to have remedied this bitter
head of inconvenience. The one was, by
an intermixture of the judicial and legislative
authorities in one person or set of
persons: the other by establishing a more stricter
& more ready intercourse than what has yet
subsisted between those two powers
when lodged as they have allways been in different hands.

In all those cases where the utility of
the decision between as applied to the individual case in question stands opposed


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/070/035/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

035

Info in main headings field

introd. utility applied to the transmission of property, contracts &c words technical and deeds law common

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23150

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in