JB/070/038/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/038/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/038/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/038/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Take the common run of men, even the best-educated<lb/>
and best-behaved, <del>men</del> who possess the<lb/>
esteem of those who know them. Attend to<lb/>
the motives <del>the</del> to which they refer their conduct.<lb/>
observe of what class they are. are they<lb/>
of that which belongs to the Religious Sanction?<lb/>
never. Nothing they more scrupulously<lb/>
avoid: as if ashamed to <sic>acknowlege</sic> themselves<lb/>
influenced by a sanction complicated<lb/>
with a set of precepts, the observance of which,<lb/>
as commonly understood, is calculated to make<lb/>
a man [at once] uncomfortable to himself,<lb/>
and incommodious to society. <del>So su</del><lb/>
So sure as a man is seen to profess an<lb/>
extraordinary <del>attachment</del> to <del>that those</del> consideration<lb/>
of that cast in preference to those of the moral<lb/>
so sure is he to become an object of men's<lb/>
ridicule, or of their disgust or of their suspicions.</p>
 
<p><del>What else should be</del><lb/>
We see how scrupulously men avoid in general<lb/>
to attribute <add><gap/></add> their conduct to motives of the religious<lb/>
kind. What else then should be the reason?<lb/>
that motives of this kind are more mercenary<lb/>
than those of the other? That cannot be:<lb/>
for they are still more remote from sense:<lb/>
<del>from</del> <add>above</add> which as motives so <del><gap/></del> <add>rise the</add> highest, they are<lb/>
<add>in</add> common aestimation<!-- ligature --> accounted the purer.<lb/>
Twas a sort of discovery, <add>of Addison's</add> and appeared so new<lb/>
as even to be paradoxical to <add>in</add> the eyes of ordinary<lb/>
readers, when <del>Addison</del> he observed that Religion<lb/>
was the highest <add>[instance of]</add> Self-love</p>
 
<pb/>
 
<p><del>A man, who makes a parade of the influence</del><lb/>
<del>that Religious considerations have over</del>
<del>him</del></p>
 
<p>What is it that gets a man the character<lb/>
of a Hypocrite? his making a parade<lb/>
of the influence that Religious considerations<lb/>
have over him</p>
 
<p><del><gap/></del> Of what class <del>do men from the catalogue</del> <add>are they who are commonly put upon</add><lb/>
<del>of</del> <add>the list of</add> Hypocrites? <del>int</del> The Religionists. <del>Out</del> <add>Are</add> of<lb/>
Moralists? <del>never</del> scarce ever</p>
 
<p>Consult the Dramatist<del>s</del>, <del>those</del> <add>him <del>who</del></add> of all others<lb/>
<add>to</add> whom it is necessary to understand &amp; fall into<lb/>
the train of notions current among mankind. <note>the springs that set mankind in motion</note><lb/>
He has a Hero to dress up: he puts him in<lb/>
a trying situation: <del>assailed by</del> <add><sic>sollicited</sic> by</add> strong passions<lb/>
to quit the line of [imagined] duty and<lb/>
triumphant over them. What <del>motives does</del> <add>considerations what</add><lb/>
motives, what reasons <add>sentiments</add> are put into his mouth<lb/>
to account for his resistance. A text of<lb/>
Scripture? no. but an <gap/> of morality.<lb/>
What principles does he expoliate upon?<lb/>
Religious ones? no. they would not be endured.<lb/>
Principles to use the common distinction<lb/>
not of conscience but of honour: principles<lb/>
referring not the <hi rend='underline'>religious</hi> but the <hi rend='underline'>moral</hi><lb/>
Sanction: the fear <add>or hope</add> of what <del>might</del> <add>may</add> be <del>done by</del> <add>to</add><lb/>
done to him hereafter.</p>
 
<p><note>Errors &amp; Distraction of Religionists</note> For want of an intelligible standard whereby to<lb/>
judge <add>measure</add> the <del><add>moral quality</add></del> morality<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>+ moral quality</note> of an action, distracted<lb/>
with uncertainties, starting at shadows.<lb/>
Out of horror of an evil which they fancy, running<lb/>
themselves and plunging others into an evil<lb/>
which they feel</p>
 
<p>What <del>should be</del> <add>would an audience</add> say to the hero of a play<lb/>
justifying <add>measuring</add> his conduct all along by texts of <gap/>?<lb/>
They would turn from him with contempt<lb/>
as undesignedly ridiculous, or with aversion<lb/>
as <add><gap/> &amp;</add> hypocritical, or with disgust, as out of <sic>na-</sic></p>
 
<head>PUNISHMENT. Sanction Religious. Disadvantages <add>Inefficacy</add> of. [BR][ ][ ] Proofs from observation</head>





Revision as of 23:34, 8 November 2012

Click Here To Edit

Take the common run of men, even the best-educated
and best-behaved, men who possess the
esteem of those who know them. Attend to
the motives the to which they refer their conduct.
observe of what class they are. are they
of that which belongs to the Religious Sanction?
never. Nothing they more scrupulously
avoid: as if ashamed to acknowlege themselves
influenced by a sanction complicated
with a set of precepts, the observance of which,
as commonly understood, is calculated to make
a man [at once] uncomfortable to himself,
and incommodious to society. So su
So sure as a man is seen to profess an
extraordinary attachment to that those consideration
of that cast in preference to those of the moral
so sure is he to become an object of men's
ridicule, or of their disgust or of their suspicions.

What else should be
We see how scrupulously men avoid in general
to attribute their conduct to motives of the religious
kind. What else then should be the reason?
that motives of this kind are more mercenary
than those of the other? That cannot be:
for they are still more remote from sense:
from above which as motives so rise the highest, they are
in common aestimation accounted the purer.
Twas a sort of discovery, of Addison's and appeared so new
as even to be paradoxical to in the eyes of ordinary
readers, when Addison he observed that Religion
was the highest [instance of] Self-love


---page break---

A man, who makes a parade of the influence
that Religious considerations have over him

What is it that gets a man the character
of a Hypocrite? his making a parade
of the influence that Religious considerations
have over him

Of what class do men from the catalogue are they who are commonly put upon
of the list of Hypocrites? int The Religionists. Out Are of
Moralists? never scarce ever

Consult the Dramatists, those him who of all others
to whom it is necessary to understand & fall into
the train of notions current among mankind. the springs that set mankind in motion
He has a Hero to dress up: he puts him in
a trying situation: assailed by sollicited by strong passions
to quit the line of [imagined] duty and
triumphant over them. What motives does considerations what
motives, what reasons sentiments are put into his mouth
to account for his resistance. A text of
Scripture? no. but an of morality.
What principles does he expoliate upon?
Religious ones? no. they would not be endured.
Principles to use the common distinction
not of conscience but of honour: principles
referring not the religious but the moral
Sanction: the fear or hope of what might may be done by to
done to him hereafter.

Errors & Distraction of Religionists For want of an intelligible standard whereby to
judge measure the moral quality morality+ + moral quality of an action, distracted
with uncertainties, starting at shadows.
Out of horror of an evil which they fancy, running
themselves and plunging others into an evil
which they feel

What should be would an audience say to the hero of a play
justifying measuring his conduct all along by texts of ?
They would turn from him with contempt
as undesignedly ridiculous, or with aversion
as & hypocritical, or with disgust, as out of na-

PUNISHMENT. Sanction Religious. Disadvantages Inefficacy of. [BR][ ][ ] Proofs from observation




Identifier: | JB/070/038/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

038

Info in main headings field

punishment sanction religious disadvantages inefficacy of proofs from observation

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23153

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in