JB/098/033/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/098/033/004: Difference between revisions

1st edit
first edit - whole page
Line 6: Line 6:
<head>5.</head><lb/>
<head>5.</head><lb/>


<p><note>Example</note>Cases of this sort are mostly those where the offence<lb/>
<p><note>Example </note>Cases of this sort are mostly those where the offence<lb/>
is such as essentially imports the destruction of prosperity,<lb/>
is such as essentially imports the destruction of prosperity,<lb/>
circumstanced as such offences are in common.</p>
circumstanced as such offences are in common.</p>
<head>6.</head>
<head>6.</head>
<p><del>The Cases which in the third place have the strong-<lb/>est claim to compensation </del>
<note>Cases that have the 3.<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> best Claim to Compensation.- </note>Another set of Cases are those<lb/>
in which loss or inconvenience of the party damnified<lb/>
is not pecuniary or quasi-pecuniary, and the author of<lb/>
the damage received a profit or advantage which is not<lb/>
<note>Damage not pecuniary - profit not pecuniary. </note>pecuniary nor quasi-pecuniary neither: but <del><gap/></del> of the<lb/>
<add>vindictive or </add>malevolent kind: <add>to which we may add as distinct from the quasi-pecuniary kind, the <gap/></add> These cases occupy the third rank a-<lb/>
mong those which afford a claim to compensation.</p>
<head><del>8.</del>7.</head>
<p><note>Example </note>Cases of this sort are mostly those where the offence<lb/>
is a personal injury, circumstanced as such offences are<lb/>
in common.</p>
<head>8.</head>
<p><note>Cases that have the 4.<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> best claim to Compensation. </note>Another set of cases are those in which the loss or<lb/>
inconvenience of the party damnified is pecuniary or qua-<lb/>
si-</p>
<pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:18, 27 November 2012

Click Here To Edit

C
Of Compensation.
5.

Example Cases of this sort are mostly those where the offence
is such as essentially imports the destruction of prosperity,
circumstanced as such offences are in common.

6.

The Cases which in the third place have the strong-
est claim to compensation
Cases that have the 3.d best Claim to Compensation.- Another set of Cases are those
in which loss or inconvenience of the party damnified
is not pecuniary or quasi-pecuniary, and the author of
the damage received a profit or advantage which is not
Damage not pecuniary - profit not pecuniary. pecuniary nor quasi-pecuniary neither: but of the
vindictive or malevolent kind: to which we may add as distinct from the quasi-pecuniary kind, the These cases occupy the third rank a-
mong those which afford a claim to compensation.

8.7.

Example Cases of this sort are mostly those where the offence
is a personal injury, circumstanced as such offences are
in common.

8.

Cases that have the 4.th best claim to Compensation. Another set of cases are those in which the loss or
inconvenience of the party damnified is pecuniary or qua-
si-


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/098/033/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 98.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-8

Box

098

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

033

Info in main headings field

of compensation

Image

004

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31641

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in