JB/116/182/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/182/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<p>Having submitted to Your Lordship this view of <lb/>the natural consequences of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitts and M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Rose's way<lb/> of doing business, I come <del>t</del> now to speak more distinctly <lb/>of the probably causes of the <unclear>choice</unclear> thus made of it.</p>  
<p>Having submitted to Your Lordship this view of <lb/>the natural consequences of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitts and M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Rose's way<lb/> of doing business, I come <del>t</del> now to speak more distinctly <lb/>of the probably causes of the <unclear>choice</unclear> thus made of it.</p>  


<P>At a prodigious <sic>expence</sic>, Convicts were sent out by <lb/>thousands, his Majesty's troops by hundreds, besides Civil <lb/>Officers &#x2014; under the highest probability of perishing every<lb/> man of them either by intestine war or by famine. By <lb/>famine a part did perish accordingly: by intestine war, <add>happily <del>f</del> not any:</add> <del>one</del>: <lb/>because under the auspices of necessity, <add>[+]</add> <note>[+] and the protection of military force, despotism was employed to fill up the deficiencies of law.</note> <del>illegal power took the <lb/>place of legal.</del> The defenceless state of the <del>both</del> <add>subject part</add> of the<lb/> community, joined to the forcible state of the governing <lb/>part &#x2014;(the military) &#x2014; <del>proved</del> <add>did indeed</add> <del>in the event</del>, <add>prove</add> a security against<lb/> total destruction: <add>in the event:</add> but  
<P>At a prodigious <sic>expence</sic>, Convicts were sent out by <lb/>thousands, his Majesty's troops by hundreds, besides Civil <lb/>Officers &#x2014; under the highest probability of perishing every<lb/> man of them either by intestine war or by famine. By <lb/>famine a part did perish accordingly: by intestine war, <add>happily <del>f</del> not any:</add> <del>one</del>: <lb/>because under the auspices of necessity, <add>[+]</add> <note>[+] and the protection of military force, despotism was employed to fill up the deficiencies of law.</note> <del>illegal power took the <lb/>place of legal.</del> The defenceless state of the <del>both</del> <add>subject part</add> of the<lb/> community, joined to the forcible state of the governing <lb/>part &#x2014;(the military) &#x2014; <del>proved</del> <add>did indeed</add> <del>in the event</del>, <add>prove</add> a security against<lb/> total destruction: <add>in the event:</add> but antecedently to <del>that</del> <add>the</add> event, <del>afforded</del> <add>neither <add>it was not in the nature, either of <lb/>this <del>nor</del> <add>or</add> any <del>other</del> <add>still greater</add> superiority of force to afford any</add>





Revision as of 00:40, 5 December 2012

Click Here To Edit

1 July 1802 18 1 38
N. W. Wales

Having submitted to Your Lordship this view of
the natural consequences of Mr Pitts and Mr Rose's way
of doing business, I come t now to speak more distinctly
of the probably causes of the choice thus made of it.

At a prodigious expence, Convicts were sent out by
thousands, his Majesty's troops by hundreds, besides Civil
Officers — under the highest probability of perishing every
man of them either by intestine war or by famine. By
famine a part did perish accordingly: by intestine war, happily f not any: one:
because under the auspices of necessity, [+] [+] and the protection of military force, despotism was employed to fill up the deficiencies of law. illegal power took the
place of legal.
The defenceless state of the both subject part of the
community, joined to the forcible state of the governing
part —(the military) — proved did indeed in the event, prove a security against
total destruction: in the event: but antecedently to that the event, afforded neither <add>it was not in the nature, either of
this nor <add>or
any other still greater superiority of force to afford any</add>

Identifier: | JB/116/182/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

1

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

182

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / f38

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37715

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in