JB/100/002/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/100/002/002: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/100/002/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/100/002/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>NOTORIETY. N.Y. Books. Necessity of Scheme <add>of the Argument</add> <hi rend='superscript'>1</hi></head>
<p><note>N.Y.B. Mss. Rep. Inaccessible.</note>
(1 <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> But supposing it <gap/> possible which it is not,<lb/>
why be content with leaving<!-- or "having" --> within the verge <add>sphere</add> of<lb/>
possibility what it is but to speak the word in<lb/>
order to accomplish,</p>
<note>unjust to the <gap/>, to sacrifice <add><gap/></add> the interests of a large body to the aggrandisement of a few: unjust to men at large, <add><gap/></add> for it is with Law as it is with other commodities, the fewer hands it is in, the longer it must be waited for, <add>one wait to get it,</add> <unclear>&amp;</unclear> the higher it must be paid.</note>
<sic>Shew</sic>. 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi>. That <unclear>when</unclear> even if the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> <unclear>conscience</unclear><lb/>
cannot. 2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> that it would be injustice to the <del><gap/></del><lb/>
of <del>the</del> body <add>at large</add> if they could: 3<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> That <del>the <gap/> of</del> the<lb/>
body at large cannot. <del>3</del>4<add>thly</add> <gap/> because<lb/>
they cannot fill 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> all <hi rend='underline'>time</hi> nor 2<add>dly</add> all<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>place</hi> &#x2014;




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:56, 20 December 2012

Click Here To Edit


NOTORIETY. N.Y. Books. Necessity of Scheme of the Argument 1

N.Y.B. Mss. Rep. Inaccessible. (1 [+] But supposing it possible which it is not,
why be content with leaving within the verge sphere of
possibility what it is but to speak the word in
order to accomplish,

unjust to the , to sacrifice the interests of a large body to the aggrandisement of a few: unjust to men at large, for it is with Law as it is with other commodities, the fewer hands it is in, the longer it must be waited for, one wait to get it, & the higher it must be paid. Shew. 1st. That when even if the 1st conscience
cannot. 2dly that it would be injustice to the
of the body at large if they could: 3dly That the of the
body at large cannot. 34thly because
they cannot fill 1st all time nor 2dly all
place



Identifier: | JB/100/002/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

100

Main Headings

digest

Folio number

002

Info in main headings field

notoriety ny books necessity of scheme of the argument

Image

002

Titles

n. year books

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

32018

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in