JB/050/073/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/073/001: Difference between revisions

Jmcress (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jmcress (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<lb/><p>In a word to <unclear>commons</unclear> an illustration from Nature<lb/> <unclear>Philosophy</unclear> [a natural way]. A Decision<lb/> founded on a Statute is a ray of light if using<lb/> from the Statute as its <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi>Radiant. A Decision<lb/> founded when Common Law is a way of using<lb/> an <gap/><gap/><hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi><gap/>, which <hi rend='superscript'>are very<gap/></hi> <gap/>its false Radi-<lb/>ant. </p>
<lb/><p>In a word to <unclear>commons</unclear> an illustration from Nature<lb/> <unclear>Philosophy</unclear> [a natural way]. A Decision<lb/> founded on a Statute is a ray of light if using<lb/> from the Statute as its <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi>Radiant. A Decision<lb/> founded when Common Law is a way of using<lb/> an <gap/><gap/><hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi><gap/>, which <hi rend='superscript'>are very<gap/></hi> <gap/>its false Radi-<lb/>ant. </p>
<pb/>
<pb/>
<p>A decision grounded when a statute always de-<lb/> claims that the fact in question is <del><gap/></del> <hi rend='superscript'>an individual</hi><lb/> of that <del><gap/></del><hi rend='superscript'> <unclear>thinks</unclear></hi> of facts <hi rend='superscript'>as one thinks of <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/>  </hi>on which the <hi rend='superscript'><gap/>is of <gap/></hi> <unclear>thoughts</unclear><lb/> <hi rend='superscript'>-knownst</hi> of the <gap/> <gap/> it <gap/> <gap/> of a <gap/><lb/> hand <del><gap/> decision <hi rend='superscript'><gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> thoughts</hi> <gap/> made <gap/> <gap/> a </del> </p>
<p>A decision grounded when a statute always de- <lb/> claims that the fact in question is <del><gap/></del> <hi rend='superscript'>an individual</hi><lb/> of that <del><gap/></del><hi rend='superscript'> <unclear>thinks</unclear></hi> of facts <hi rend='superscript'>as one thinks of <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/>  </hi>on which the <hi rend='superscript'><gap/>is of <gap/></hi> <unclear>thoughts</unclear><lb/> <hi rend='superscript'>-knownst</hi> of the <gap/> <gap/> it <gap/> <gap/> of a <gap/><lb/> hand <del><gap/> decision <hi rend='superscript'><gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> thoughts</hi> <gap/> made <gap/> <gap/> a </del> &#x2014;
<pb>
 
<p>The specific rule <gap/> <lb/> (or rather the <gap/>, to I think with <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> with his life <unclear>precision</unclear>) that is the proposition <lb/> producing these two <unclear>specific</unclear> <gap/> one <del>of <gap/> or </del><lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> as <gap/> <unclear>from</unclear> the other with it</lb> has been formed by the <gap/> authority, <unclear>clothed</unclear><lb/> in certain language, and that language<lb/> fixed by certain <unclear>permanent</unclear>  natural <unclear>works</unclear>, then <gap/> upon a <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi><unclear>permanent</unclear> <hi rend='superscript'>natural</hi> <gap/>, the</lb> <gap/> in a word it is a written Law. </lb> When this decision is grounded upon the Common</lb> Law that is upon <gap/> decisions, no <unclear>words</unclear><lb/>  <gap/> <gap/>. <del><gap/> is <gap/> <gap/> <hi rend='superscript'><del><gap</del></hi> of <gap/><gap/></del></lb> <del><gap/></del>. The decision is <hi rend='underline'><unclear>"guard"</unclear></hi> from such</lb> a rule <hi rend='superscript'><del><unclear>No such</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>for there</unclear> <gap/></del></hi><del><gap/> rule is <gap/> which is a</del> </lb> No such rule can exist because <gap/> is <gap/></lb> then the idea <unclear>compounded</unclear> in [that <gap/> of] this</lb> decision. Every decision is <unclear>handwritten</unclear>; <gap/></lb> -ded upon the particular fact which <gap/></lb> for it. This natural rule, is a rule which</lb> <note>LAW Common X Statute.</note> is <unclear>happened</unclear>, a <unclear>figment</unclear> of the imagination, <gap/></lb> by <gap/>, on the one hand from <del>the</del><hi rend='superscript'>a <gap/></hi></lb> particular fact <gap/> this from a particular</lb> <gap/> <gap/> with it, in this manner <gap/></lb> have mastered.</p>
The specific rule <gap/> <lb/> [or rather the <gap/>, to I think with <gap/> <gap/> <lb/> with his life <unclear>precision</unclear>] that is the proposition <lb/> producing these two <unclear>specific</unclear> <gap/> one <del>of <gap/> or </del><lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> as <gap/> <unclear>from</unclear> the other with it<lb/> has been formed by the <gap/> authority, <unclear>clothed</unclear><lb/> in certain language, and that language<lb/> fixed by certain <unclear>permanent</unclear>  natural <unclear>works</unclear>, then <gap/> upon a <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi><unclear>permanent</unclear> <hi rend='superscript'>natural</hi> <gap/>, the<lb/> <gap/> in a word it is a written Law. <lb/> When this decision is grounded upon the Common<lb/> Law that is upon <gap/> decisions, no <unclear>words</unclear><lb/>  <gap/> <gap/>. <del><gap/> is <gap/> <gap/> <hi rend='superscript'><gap</del></hi> of <gap/><gap/></del><lb/> <del><gap/></del>. The decision is <hi rend='underline'><unclear>"guard"</unclear></hi> from such<lb/> a rule <hi rend='superscript'><del><unclear>No such</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>for there</unclear> <gap/></del></hi><del><gap/> rule is <gap/> which is a</del> <lb/> No such rule can exist because <gap/> is <gap/><lb/> then the idea <unclear>compounded</unclear> in [that <gap/> of] this<lb/> decision. Every decision is <unclear>handwritten</unclear>; <gap/><lb/> -ded upon the particular fact which <gap/><lb/> for it. This natural rule, is a rule which<lb/> <note>LAW Common X Statute.</note> is <unclear>happened</unclear>, a <unclear>figment</unclear> of the imagination, <gap/><lb/> by <gap/>, on the one hand from <del>the</del><hi rend='superscript'>a <gap/></hi><lb/> particular fact <gap/> this from a particular<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> with it, in this manner <gap/><lb/> have mastered.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:18, 27 December 2012

Click Here To Edit LAW & COMMON STATUTE —Decisions all particular. No General Rule Exists


In a word to commons an illustration from Nature
Philosophy [a natural way]. A Decision
founded on a Statute is a ray of light if using
from the Statute as its Radiant. A Decision
founded when Common Law is a way of using
an , which are very its false Radi-
ant.


---page break---

A decision grounded when a statute always de-
claims that the fact in question is an individual
of that thinks of facts as one thinks of of on which the is of thoughts
-knownst of the it of a
hand decision of thoughts made a — The specific rule
[or rather the , to I think with
with his life precision] that is the proposition
producing these two specific one of or
as from the other with it
has been formed by the authority, clothed
in certain language, and that language
fixed by certain permanent natural works, then upon a permanent natural , the
in a word it is a written Law.
When this decision is grounded upon the Common
Law that is upon decisions, no words
. is <hi rend='superscript'><gap</hi> of
. The decision is "guard" from such
a rule No such for there rule is which is a
No such rule can exist because is
then the idea compounded in [that of] this
decision. Every decision is handwritten;
-ded upon the particular fact which
for it. This natural rule, is a rule which
LAW Common X Statute. is happened, a figment of the imagination,
by , on the one hand from thea
particular fact this from a particular
with it, in this manner
have mastered.



Identifier: | JB/050/073/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

073

Info in main headings field

law common & statute - decisions all particular - no general rule exists

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16064

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in