★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<p>In the East Indies — at that comparatively small <del>dr</del> <lb/>distance — <del>power it was | <p>In the East Indies — at that comparatively small <del>dr</del> <lb/>distance — <del>power it was | ||
</del> society it had been found could<lb/> not be kept together if power were lodged otherwise <lb/>than in a single hand. <del>At first it had</del> Even from<lb/> the first it had been lodged in a single body <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> and that composed of no more than four members </note> without<lb/> any such <del>feature belonging to it</del> <add><gap/></add> as that of a more numerous <lb/>body delegating its powers by | </del> society it had been found could<lb/> not be kept together if power were lodged otherwise <lb/>than in a single hand. <del>At first it had</del> Even from<lb/> the first it had been lodged in a single body <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> and that composed of no more than four members </note> without<lb/> any such <del>feature belonging to it</del> <add><gap/></add> as that of a more numerous <lb/>body delegating its powers by election. But as in that<lb/> single body <add>and that</add> the power had been distributed in <unclear>shows</unclear> <lb/>as nearly equal as possible among the members, it had<lb/> still undergone division: but even this degree of division <lb/>was found — and that by long experience — incompatible<lb/> with any tolerable <add>degree of</add> security for its existence. With such <lb/>checks as could be applied <add>to the power</add> without the division of the power <lb/>itself, <del>it</del> <add>the supreme legal power</add> was accordingly vested in a single hand.</p> | ||
27 June 1802 5
N. S. Wales
In the East Indies — at that comparatively small dr
distance — power it was
society it had been found could
not be kept together if power were lodged otherwise
than in a single hand. At first it had Even from
the first it had been lodged in a single body [+] [+] and that composed of no more than four members without
any such feature belonging to it as that of a more numerous
body delegating its powers by election. But as in that
single body and that the power had been distributed in shows
as nearly equal as possible among the members, it had
still undergone division: but even this degree of division
was found — and that by long experience — incompatible
with any tolerable degree of security for its existence. With such
checks as could be applied to the power without the division of the power
itself, it the supreme legal power was accordingly vested in a single hand.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/186/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-06-27 |
4 |
||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
186 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d5 / f42 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
37719 |
|||
