★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 4. Spirituous liquors. p. 471. April 1796. Toward preventing <lb/>the indiscriminate sale of spirits which at this time<lb/> prevailed in all the settlements, the Governor thought that <lb/>granting licenses to a few persons of good character might <lb/>have a good effect — <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note>"<hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi>Ten persons were "selected by the Magistrates "and to them licenses for "twelve months, under "the hands of three "magistrates were granted. "The principals were "bound in the usual "penalties of twenty "pounds cash, and "obliged to find his "<unclear>securities</unclear> in his "friends."</note> So far the Judge Advocate; <del>for</del> any<lb/> hope on this occasion is that <del>th at this time</del> <add>now in April</add> the "design that<lb/> "had been formed by individuals of making application to the <lb/>"Governor" did not appear quite so strong, as in the preceding<lb/> January. The persons thus selected <del>had</del> were I doubt<lb/> not of good character; allowance made for the difference <lb/>in the import of that term in New South Wales and Britain.<lb/> <del>My difficulty as to understand how</del> <add><del>The with our</del></add> To me two things on<lb/> this occasion present themselves as <del>somewhat difficult</del> <add>requiring explanation:</add> how are <add>Why is</add> <lb/><gap/> spirit distilled <add>or sold</add> by a good man should produce less | <p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 4. Spirituous liquors. p. 471. April 1796. Toward preventing <lb/>the indiscriminate sale of spirits which at this time<lb/> prevailed in all the settlements, the Governor thought that <lb/>granting licenses to a few persons of good character might <lb/>have a good effect — <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note>"<hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi>Ten persons were "selected by the Magistrates "and to them licenses for "twelve months, under "the hands of three "magistrates were granted. "The principals were "bound in the usual "penalties of twenty "pounds cash, and "obliged to find his "<unclear>securities</unclear> in his "friends."</note> So far the Judge Advocate; <del>for</del> any<lb/> hope on this occasion is that <del>th at this time</del> <add>now in April</add> the "design that<lb/> "had been formed by individuals of making application to the <lb/>"Governor" did not appear quite so strong, as in the preceding<lb/> January. The persons thus selected <del>had</del> were I doubt<lb/> not of good character; allowance made for the difference <lb/>in the import of that term in New South Wales and Britain.<lb/> <del>My difficulty as to understand how</del> <add><del>The with our</del></add> To me two things on<lb/> this occasion present themselves as <del>somewhat difficult</del> <add>requiring explanation:</add> how are <add>Why is</add> <lb/><gap/> spirit distilled <add>or sold</add> by a good man should produce less | ||
<lb/> drunkenness <del>measure for measure</del> than the same measure <add>quantity</add> <lb/>distilled <add>or sold</add> by a bad man: <add>both being equally <unclear>pure</unclear></add> The <del><gap/> I should</del> difference of <lb/>any I should rather have expected to find on the other<lb/> side: because he <gap/> the | <lb/> drunkenness <del>measure for measure</del> than the same measure <add>quantity</add> <lb/>distilled <add>or sold</add> by a bad man: <add>both being equally <unclear>pure</unclear></add> The <del><gap/> I should</del> difference of <lb/>any I should rather have expected to find on the other<lb/> side: because he were the <unclear>more</unclear>, the <unclear>reason</unclear> he would be apt<lb/> to cheat, both in strength and quantity. The other <add>doubt</add> is <lb/>how the <del><gap/></del> <add>in what respect and degree</add> giving to <del>two persons</del> <add>these two good men</add> the license for <del>distillation</del> <add>the sale</add> <lb/>of liquid poison — to each of them for any thing that appears<lb/> <del>without</del> as much as ever he could <del>continue to distill</del> <add>find customers for</add> <del>shoul</del> <lb/> could have contributed to render the quantity <add>sold or <add>produced</add> consumed</add> of it upon the<lb/> whole less than <add>it would have been</add> otherwise. That the "<hi rend='underline'>indiscriminate</hi>" sale <lb/>of it <del>was thus</del> prevented <add>may thus have been</add> is <del>at</del> not to be denied: but <del>what is <lb/>any body the better for it?</del> how is the quantum of the <gap/> <lb/> lessened by it? <hi rend='underline'>Indiscriminate</hi> is a plausible word: but <lb/>to <del>try the rest</del> exhibit the probable effect of such a regulation<lb/> in its genuine colours, strike out <del>the wor</del> <hi rend='underline'>indiscriminate</hi> <lb/>and put <hi rend='underline'>copious</hi> in its stead, "Toward preventing the <lb/>copious sale of spirits the Governor thought that granting licenses <del>"</del> <lb/> <add>to</add> | ||
</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
13 July 1802 4
N. S. Wales
1
No 4. Spirituous liquors. p. 471. April 1796. Toward preventing
the indiscriminate sale of spirits which at this time
prevailed in all the settlements, the Governor thought that
granting licenses to a few persons of good character might
have a good effect — [+] "[+]Ten persons were "selected by the Magistrates "and to them licenses for "twelve months, under "the hands of three "magistrates were granted. "The principals were "bound in the usual "penalties of twenty "pounds cash, and "obliged to find his "securities in his "friends." So far the Judge Advocate; for any
hope on this occasion is that th at this time now in April the "design that
"had been formed by individuals of making application to the
"Governor" did not appear quite so strong, as in the preceding
January. The persons thus selected had were I doubt
not of good character; allowance made for the difference
in the import of that term in New South Wales and Britain.
My difficulty as to understand how The with our To me two things on
this occasion present themselves as somewhat difficult requiring explanation: how are Why is
spirit distilled or sold by a good man should produce less
drunkenness measure for measure than the same measure quantity
distilled or sold by a bad man: both being equally pure The I should difference of
any I should rather have expected to find on the other
side: because he were the more, the reason he would be apt
to cheat, both in strength and quantity. The other doubt is
how the in what respect and degree giving to two persons these two good men the license for distillation the sale
of liquid poison — to each of them for any thing that appears
without as much as ever he could continue to distill find customers for shoul
could have contributed to render the quantity sold or <add>produced consumed</add> of it upon the
whole less than it would have been otherwise. That the "indiscriminate" sale
of it was thus prevented may thus have been is at not to be denied: but what is
any body the better for it? how is the quantum of the
lessened by it? Indiscriminate is a plausible word: but
to try the rest exhibit the probable effect of such a regulation
in its genuine colours, strike out the wor indiscriminate
and put copious in its stead, "Toward preventing the
copious sale of spirits the Governor thought that granting licenses "
to
Identifier: | JB/116/169/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-07-13 |
|||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
169 |
n. s. wales |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d4 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
1800 |
|||
37702 |
|||