JB/116/590/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/590/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<p>The plan being to be made, by whom was it to be<lb/> filled? By any body that had <add>so made a</add> the will to <del>do perform</del> <add>fulfill</add> <lb/>the duties of it? by any body who had so much as<lb/> the <hi rend='underline'>power</hi>? &#x2014; Alas! no: &#x2014; under Lord Pelham such<lb/> requisites are not required.</p>
<p>The plan being to be made, by whom was it to be<lb/> filled? By any body that had <add>so made a</add> the will to <del>do perform</del> <add>fulfill</add> <lb/>the duties of it? by any body who had so much as<lb/> the <hi rend='underline'>power</hi>? &#x2014; Alas! no: &#x2014; under Lord Pelham such<lb/> requisites are not required.</p>


 
<p>Had the removal of the abuse been the object, one <lb/> description of persons were marked out by <del><unclear>conscience</unclear> since</del>, <add>the nature of the case,</add> as <lb/>the persons to be <hi rend='underline'>advised with</hi> at least, about the choice. They, <lb/>it is scarce necessary to say, were the persons, <del>by</del> <add>from</add> whose <lb/>spontaneous <add>and disinterested</add> exertions <del>the</del> knowledge of <del>the</del> existence <add>of the mischief</add> had been <lb/>obtained. <del>Here, at <gap/> were</del> <add>In that quarter <del>any rate</del> appeared at any rate</add> the <unclear>fairest</unclear> presumption in <del>respect<lb/> of the will</del> <add>regard<lb/> to <hi rend='underline'>will </hi> &#x2014; <add>the clearest proof</add> of a <hi rend='underline'>disposition</hi> at least, <del>to do what<lb/> depended on them</del> <add>not to grudge what <del>ever<lb/> <add>exertions</add> might be done with most effect</del></add>
 





Revision as of 01:56, 10 January 2013

Click Here To Edit

27 Decr 1802 + 3
Letter

The plan being to be made, by whom was it to be
filled? By any body that had so made a the will to do perform fulfill
the duties of it? by any body who had so much as
the power? — Alas! no: — under Lord Pelham such
requisites are not required.

Had the removal of the abuse been the object, one
description of persons were marked out by conscience since, the nature of the case, as
the persons to be advised with at least, about the choice. They,
it is scarce necessary to say, were the persons, by from whose
spontaneous and disinterested exertions the knowledge of the existence of the mischief had been
obtained. Here, at were In that quarter any rate appeared at any rate the fairest presumption in respect
of the will
regard
to will — <add>the clearest proof
of a disposition at least, to do what
depended on them
not to grudge what ever
<add>exertions
might be done with most effect</add>

Identifier: | JB/116/590/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-12-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

6

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

590

Info in main headings field

letter

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d7 / f47

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7

ID Number

38123

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in