JB/051/286/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/286/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




01-Oct-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.
26-Jan-2013: Proofreading: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.




<!-- NB: please note the first two partial folios have been deleted diagonally.  Please add delete tags, as necessary. -->
<!-- NB: please note the first two partial folios have been deleted diagonally.  Delete tags have therefore been added.  Amend as necessary. -->


<p><note>Appeal  III. Remedia</note><!-- note in pencil -->  and improved all concurr in manifesting the
<p><del><note>Appeal  III. Remedia</note><!-- note in pencil -->  and improved all concurr in manifesting the
<lb/>
<lb/>
importance of uniformity .
importance of uniformity .
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil -->
<pb/>


<p><!-- indented --><note>Note addition</note>  The consideration of uniformity <add>of decision ,</add> though naturally
<p><!-- indented --><note>Note addition</note>  The consideration of uniformity <add>of decision ,</add> though naturally
Line 20: Line 23:
<lb/>
<lb/>
it a matter of indifference whether a rule of <add>law</add>  
it a matter of indifference whether a rule of <add>law</add>  
<lb/></p>
<lb/></del></p>


<!-- I'm apt to think that the horizontal line in this case is simply there for the purposes of deletion of the paragraph.  Add a separate comment tag, or amend this one if it's required to be denoted as a 'horizontal line' -->
<pb/>
<pb/>
<lb/>
<lb/>
proofreading from here................................................................................................................................
<lb/>


<head>Note</head><!-- left of centre -->
<head>Note</head><!-- left of centre -->

Revision as of 20:50, 26 January 2013

Click Here To Edit


26-Jan-2013: Proofreading: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.


Appeal III. Remedia and improved all concurr in manifesting the
importance of uniformity .


---page break---

Note addition The consideration of uniformity of decision , though naturally
connected with that of rectitude of decision
is perfectly distinct from it . Conceive
it a matter of indifference whether a rule of law


---page break---



proofreading from here................................................................................................................................


Note

Appeal III . Remedia . the remedy they would propose.

In England no sooner does a clause in a
Statute become the subject of decision , than the public science
is <add>is loaded are cursed gratified science is loaded with a history of the arguments at
large in or in thirty folio pages which are either


---page break---

Addition to nNote (g) to . 3 . being the last note

Private interests would likewise interfere the decision
on in the business
with the decision and shake the probity , or what would
be as bad the reputation for probity of those who were to
give it



Identifier: | JB/051/286/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

5

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

286

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16451

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in