JB/100/090/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/100/090/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<p>If there should be particular provision that<lb/> appears <del>to</del> <add>at first sight to be</add> repugnant to one more general, let<lb/> them be reconciled <add>however</add> if possible: if not, let the<lb/> particular prevail over the general.</p>  
<p>If there should be particular provision that<lb/> appears <del>to</del> <add>at first sight to be</add> repugnant to one more general, let<lb/> them be reconciled <add>however</add> if possible: if not, let the<lb/> particular prevail over the general.</p>  


<head>5.<lb/> Reasons</head>
<p>For the particular provision is established upon <lb/>a nearer and more exact view of the subject than <lb/>the general: of which it may be regarded as <del>an</del> <lb/>a correction. The narrower and more special the idea<lb/> which is the object, the clearer and more determinate is a <lb/>man's judgment with relation to it.</p>


 
<head>6</head>
 
<p>But if such a case should ever happen it is a <lb/>mark of human <sic>imbecillity</sic>, and proceeds <del>of</del> from <lb/>an inaccuracy of comprehension either in the Legislator<lb/> or in the Judge. <note>of the Legislator, inasmuch as he has <del>sh</del> made use of <del>for making use of</del> expressions that are contradictory: or of the Judge; <del>for supposing</del> <add>in as much as he has supposed</add> expressions to be contradicting, which are not so</note> 





Revision as of 01:04, 3 February 2013

Click Here To Edit

C
Interpretation
4.

If there should be particular provision that
appears to at first sight to be repugnant to one more general, let
them be reconciled however if possible: if not, let the
particular prevail over the general.

5.
Reasons

For the particular provision is established upon
a nearer and more exact view of the subject than
the general: of which it may be regarded as an
a correction. The narrower and more special the idea
which is the object, the clearer and more determinate is a
man's judgment with relation to it.

6

But if such a case should ever happen it is a
mark of human imbecillity, and proceeds of from
an inaccuracy of comprehension either in the Legislator
or in the Judge. of the Legislator, inasmuch as he has sh made use of for making use of expressions that are contradictory: or of the Judge; for supposing in as much as he has supposed expressions to be contradicting, which are not so

Identifier: | JB/100/090/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-7

Box

100

Main Headings

Folio number

090

Info in main headings field

interpretation of the code

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

32106

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in