JB/050/008/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/008/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
Shaw Excise. 367.</p>
Shaw Excise. 367.</p>


<p>4. <hi rend='underline'>Notice</hi> 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> <add>to be in</add> <sic>writting</sic>- 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> The <hi rend='underline'>time</hi> between that &amp;<lb/>
the proceeding viz. <add>between that &amp;</add> the commencement of the Sessions.<lb/>
By the Malt Act says Shaw [Excise 365] 6 days<lb/>
notice <add>&amp;</add> if there be <add>not</add> that interval then to go over to<lb/>
the next Sessions &#x2014; <foreign><unclear>semble</unclear> que</foreign> it should not be<lb/>
put off so long as there may be that distance between<lb/>
the date of the Notice &amp; the last day of the Sessions.</p>
<p>5. Whether permissible from an acquittal-?<lb/>
<foreign><unclear>semble</unclear> que</foreign> yes - <unclear>on</unclear> security given for double<lb/>
Costs out of pocket taxable by the Sessions &amp; <unclear>mitigable</unclear>&#x2014;<lb/>
But an acquittal of which a <unclear>copy</unclear><lb/>
might be made grantable should be a bar against<lb/>
another original Information.. Tho' indeed the power<lb/>
which seems to be <unclear>lost</unclear> of recommencing an information is<lb/>
only analogous to the power in regular<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>civil actions</hi> of suffering a <gap/> rather<lb/>
than an adverse verdict.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 16:03, 6 February 2013

Click Here To Edit

PROCEDURE Summary. Course delineated. JURISDICTION of APPEAL. v. III /f2.

Should always be given - + + omitted in Par. 2. 24 ss 46. Excise in II Burn 28.] in Justices to Qu. Sep tho' given from 1 Limitation of Time. extat speciatim

2. To proceed on the merits. — The form to be
amendable - extat generatim. G.2. c. .v. Polychrista inventa.

3. Evidence fresh whether admissible or no.
que non. + + But this precludes it from the advantage of a which or no it were New Trial which might be expedient sometimes, as in case of forthcomingness of a Witness not before obtainable v. Divinity— As imparting censure the original Judge it not proper- as revisory. Shaw Excise. 367.

4. Notice 1st to be in writting- 2d The time between that &
the proceeding viz. between that & the commencement of the Sessions.
By the Malt Act says Shaw [Excise 365] 6 days
notice & if there be not that interval then to go over to
the next Sessions — semble que it should not be
put off so long as there may be that distance between
the date of the Notice & the last day of the Sessions.

5. Whether permissible from an acquittal-?
semble que yes - on security given for double
Costs out of pocket taxable by the Sessions & mitigable
But an acquittal of which a copy
might be made grantable should be a bar against
another original Information.. Tho' indeed the power
which seems to be lost of recommencing an information is
only analogous to the power in regular
civil actions of suffering a rather
than an adverse verdict.



Identifier: | JB/050/008/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

008

Info in main headings field

procedure summary. course delineated

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15999

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in