★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Shaw Excise. 367.</p> | Shaw Excise. 367.</p> | ||
<p>4. <hi rend='underline'>Notice</hi> 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> <add>to be in</add> <sic>writting</sic>- 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> The <hi rend='underline'>time</hi> between that &<lb/> | |||
the proceeding viz. <add>between that &</add> the commencement of the Sessions.<lb/> | |||
By the Malt Act says Shaw [Excise 365] 6 days<lb/> | |||
notice <add>&</add> if there be <add>not</add> that interval then to go over to<lb/> | |||
the next Sessions — <foreign><unclear>semble</unclear> que</foreign> it should not be<lb/> | |||
put off so long as there may be that distance between<lb/> | |||
the date of the Notice & the last day of the Sessions.</p> | |||
<p>5. Whether permissible from an acquittal-?<lb/> | |||
<foreign><unclear>semble</unclear> que</foreign> yes - <unclear>on</unclear> security given for double<lb/> | |||
Costs out of pocket taxable by the Sessions & <unclear>mitigable</unclear>—<lb/> | |||
But an acquittal of which a <unclear>copy</unclear><lb/> | |||
might be made grantable should be a bar against<lb/> | |||
another original Information.. Tho' indeed the power<lb/> | |||
which seems to be <unclear>lost</unclear> of recommencing an information is<lb/> | |||
only analogous to the power in regular<lb/> | |||
<hi rend='underline'>civil actions</hi> of suffering a <gap/> rather<lb/> | |||
than an adverse verdict.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
PROCEDURE Summary. Course delineated. JURISDICTION of APPEAL. v. III /f2.
Should always be given - + + omitted in Par. 2. 24 ss 46. Excise in II Burn 28.] in Justices to Qu. Sep tho' given from 1 Limitation of Time. extat speciatim
2. To proceed on the merits. — The form to be
amendable - extat generatim. G.2. c. .v. Polychrista inventa.
3. Evidence fresh whether admissible or no.
que non. +
+ But this precludes it from the advantage of a which or no it were New Trial which might be expedient sometimes, as in case of forthcomingness of a Witness not before obtainable v. Divinity— As imparting censure the original Judge it not proper- as revisory.
Shaw Excise. 367.
4. Notice 1st to be in writting- 2d The time between that &
the proceeding viz. between that & the commencement of the Sessions.
By the Malt Act says Shaw [Excise 365] 6 days
notice & if there be not that interval then to go over to
the next Sessions — semble que it should not be
put off so long as there may be that distance between
the date of the Notice & the last day of the Sessions.
5. Whether permissible from an acquittal-?
semble que yes - on security given for double
Costs out of pocket taxable by the Sessions & mitigable—
But an acquittal of which a copy
might be made grantable should be a bar against
another original Information.. Tho' indeed the power
which seems to be lost of recommencing an information is
only analogous to the power in regular
civil actions of suffering a rather
than an adverse verdict.
Identifier: | JB/050/008/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
050 |
procedure code |
||
008 |
procedure summary. course delineated |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
15999 |
|||