★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <unclear>Ass</unclear>. p 1 <unclear>Hawk</unclear>. 3 but only his own opinion.</note></p> | <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <unclear>Ass</unclear>. p 1 <unclear>Hawk</unclear>. 3 but only his own opinion.</note></p> | ||
<p>2 If so, then | <p>2 If so, then according to legal Ideas, not <del>only <gap/></del> <add><unclear>the</unclear></add><lb/> | ||
she only but <hi rend='underline'>he</hi> also (contrary to what might be<lb/> | she only but <hi rend='underline'>he</hi> also (contrary to what might be<lb/> | ||
the general notion) should be summon'd to defend<lb/></p> | the general notion) should be summon'd to defend<lb/></p> | ||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
<p>3. Is she or he liable then to the <unclear><sic>succedaneous</sic></unclear><lb/> | <p>3. Is she or he liable then to the <unclear><sic>succedaneous</sic></unclear><lb/> | ||
Punishment for want of distrainables.</p> | Punishment for want of distrainables.</p> | ||
<p>4. By Common Law this would be determined<lb/> | |||
from considering whether the Imprisonment<lb/> | |||
was designed (& this might appear variously<lb/> | |||
in various offences) as a means of compelling<lb/> | |||
the payment of the fine, or as a <unclear>substantive</unclear><lb/> | |||
punishment. <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> | |||
<note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> but v. III <unclear>Bl. Consm</unclear> 414.</note></p> | |||
<p>5. But the most expedient way of ordering<lb/> | |||
by Statute would be, that the Wife should<lb/> | |||
suffer it<lb/> | |||
1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> To avoid the apparent injustice of a<lb/> | |||
vicarious distribution<lb/> | |||
2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> That the check <add>restraint</add> may be applied to <add>operate on</add><lb/> | |||
the same person as the temptation; which<lb/> | |||
in every case but that of a strict union of<lb/> | |||
affections between the married pair is absolutely<lb/> | |||
necessary: | |||
3<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> That the imprisonment of the wife, <unclear>which</unclear><lb/> | |||
has at least an equal effect in the light<lb/> | |||
of an example is least detrimental to the<lb/> | |||
affairs of the family, which commonly <unclear>depend</unclear><lb/> | |||
upon the Husband principally for subsistance</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
PROCEDURE Summary. Course delineated. JURISDICTION of APPEAL. v. III /f2.
Should always be given - + + omitted in Par. 2. 24 ss 46. Excise in II Burn 28.] in Justices to Qu. Sep tho' given from 1 Limitation of Time. extat speciatim
2. To proceed on the merits. — The form to be
amendable - extat generatim. G.2. c. .v. Polychrista inventa.
3. Evidence fresh whether admissible or no.
que non. +
+ But this precludes it from the advantage of a which or no it were New Trial which might be expedient sometimes, as in case of forthcomingness of a Witness not before obtainable v. Divinity— As imparting censure the original Judge it not proper- as revisory.
Shaw Excise. 367.
4. Notice 1st to be in writting- 2d The time between that &
the proceeding viz. between that & the commencement of the Sessions.
By the Malt Act says Shaw [Excise 365] 6 days
notice & if there be not that interval then to go over to
the next Sessions — semble que it should not be
put off so long as there may be that distance between
the date of the Notice & the last day of the Sessions.
5. Whether permissible from an acquittal-?
semble que yes - on security given for double
Costs out of pocket taxable by the Sessions & mitigable—
But an acquittal of which a copy
might be made grantable should be a bar against
another original Information.. Tho' indeed the power
which seems to be lost of recommencing an information is
only analogous to the power in regular
civil actions of suffering a rather
than an adverse verdict.
6. Deposit. ++ ++ 15. C 2. 1.11. ss19. Excise
7. Costs. exstat speciatium- Double mistrial by 15. C.2. 11 ss19.
FORMULAE
That the printed forms contain not only
the general matters with blanks for the such matters
as are particular to the case in hand but also directions
for the filling up such blanks, printed so as to
form a border to the paper.
RECORDIATO Sive INSINUATIO + + we have not of own we must be content to borrow from our neighbours.
EVIDENCE
In the following cases the Magistrate to transport
himself to the residence of the Witness.
1st In case of the Witness's being under
Imprisonment - where the Justice has no power to remove him. 2dy In case of his being
of a certain quality - As if he be a Peer
Judge. Member of either House of Parliament Knight of any
Order Privy Counsellor
Apprehensi SEIZURE and APPREHENSION
InUnder this head are considerable. 1st The person who may seize 2. the Object that may be seized. That of is either. The person of the offender. 3. The goods which subject of the other goods 25
Real or X Personal = Seizure
Seizure- Official X or Peculiar X. Private or
General
Procedendae in Personal v. G Turnpike Act.
7 G.2. 40- Specimen deficiens. Burn Exc. p.62. no 25
from Stat. 9. G.2. 35. ss20.
The Magistrate to proceed to the merits without inquiring
into the manner or form of seizure. G.2. 35 ss34
---page break---
WIFE v. Str. 1121. in Burn Excise 135. R. v-Cross
1. Husband whether responsible for offence? +
+ Ass. p 1 Hawk. 3 but only his own opinion.
2 If so, then according to legal Ideas, not only the
she only but he also (contrary to what might be
the general notion) should be summon'd to defend
3. Is she or he liable then to the succedaneous
Punishment for want of distrainables.
4. By Common Law this would be determined
from considering whether the Imprisonment
was designed (& this might appear variously
in various offences) as a means of compelling
the payment of the fine, or as a substantive
punishment. +
+ but v. III Bl. Consm 414.
5. But the most expedient way of ordering
by Statute would be, that the Wife should
suffer it
1st To avoid the apparent injustice of a
vicarious distribution
2dly That the check restraint may be applied to operate on
the same person as the temptation; which
in every case but that of a strict union of
affections between the married pair is absolutely
necessary:
3dly That the imprisonment of the wife, which
has at least an equal effect in the light
of an example is least detrimental to the
affairs of the family, which commonly depend
upon the Husband principally for subsistance
Identifier: | JB/050/008/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
050 |
procedure code |
||
008 |
procedure summary. course delineated |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
15999 |
|||