JB/070/174/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/174/002: Difference between revisions

TimCauser (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TimCauser (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
or the corruption of a Judge<lb/></p>  
or the corruption of a Judge<lb/></p>  
<p>I will give <del><gap/></del> <add>my</add> definition of a Libel deduced from the <unclear>decisions</unclear> on that <unclear>head</unclear><lb/> which I will submit to the Reader & <add>who will</add> have them judge for himself how far they<lb/> justify it.<lb/></p>
<p>I will give <del><gap/></del> <add>my</add> definition of a Libel deduced from the <unclear>decisions</unclear> on that <unclear>head</unclear><lb/> which I will submit to the Reader & <add>who will</add> have them judge for himself how far they<lb/> justify it.<lb/></p>
<note>A Libel then is an Idea or Ideas, expressed by written or printed words or<lb/>
<p>A Libel then is an Idea or Ideas, expressed by written or printed words or<lb/>
by signs, utter'd in disapprobation of the conduct of <gap/> in a private<lb/>
by signs, utter'd in disapprobation of the conduct of <gap/> in a private<lb/>
or public capacity, or in short such as a person would not like to have<lb/>
or public capacity, or in short such as a person would not like to have<lb/>
Line 20: Line 20:
think proper to submit to their determination.<lb/>
think proper to submit to their determination.<lb/>
<note>Every decision of a Jury or a<lb/>
<note>Every decision of a Jury or a<lb/>
Judge must be an act of particular Legislation <gap/> arbitrary <gap/> guided by no rule.</note></note>
Judge must be an act of particular Legislation <gap/> arbitrary <gap/> guided by no rule.</note></p>





Revision as of 14:55, 4 October 2010

Click Here To Edit

LIBEL

In the first place what is a Libel - to postpone the consideration of what ought
be reported one, till after thisnecessary question be determined.Part of the confusion
that surrounds me on every side
I am almost disposed to envy
the uncommon
of judgement of those
good Souls, who find a ready
solution for every difficulty in
the infallible integrity of a Jury
or the corruption of a Judge

I will give my definition of a Libel deduced from the decisions on that head
which I will submit to the Reader & who will have them judge for himself how far they
justify it.

A Libel then is an Idea or Ideas, expressed by written or printed words or
by signs, utter'd in disapprobation of the conduct of in a private
or public capacity, or in short such as a person would not like to have
utter'd of him, or in short such as the Jury who try the case would not
like to have said utter'd of them or the Judge Judges of the Court if the Jury
think proper to submit to their determination.
Every decision of a Jury or a
Judge must be an act of particular Legislation arbitrary guided by no rule.






Identifier: | JB/070/174/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

174

Info in main headings field

libel

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr motif] [britannia with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23289

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in