JB/050/081/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/081/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
PennyJ (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/081/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/081/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>CERTAINTY. PROCEDURE. LAW &amp; FACT.</head>
<!-- Some words at the end of lines are incomplete because the folio was cut after the text was written, and some letters have been lost. -->
<p>It is right <add><unclear>of</unclear> advantage</add> that the power of deciding on questions of law, of the power of deciding <add>on</add><lb/>
the question of fact, should be <gap/> in separate hands: if those two powers are <sic>comfor</sic><lb/>
in the hands of those to whom the latter power alone properly belongs<lb/>
If in the hands of those to whom former <unclear>appertains</unclear> <unclear>also</unclear> restraint <unclear>is gone</unclear> which <gap/><lb/>
in the <gap/> that the law declared against this or that <unclear>man</unclear> <unclear>merit</unclear> <gap/> <add>law</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
against all other and <gap/>. <del><gap/></del><lb/>
</p>
<p>What verges towards this inconvenience is the <unclear>latest</unclear> of <sic>too</sic> minute generalistations <add><unclear><sic>axiomatication</sic></unclear></add><lb/>
<unclear>stretching</unclear> the <gap/> of law too far, whereby it happens that the rules laid down <!-- only "dow" is visible on the manuscript --><lb/>
are so narrow as not <add>scarce</add> to take in any more <add>others</add> than the <gap/> case on the <unclear>occasion</unclear> <add>of</add><add>which occasioned <gap/></add><lb/> which they were <unclear>promised</unclear>. This as to the <del>arbitrary
<unclear><sic>lawer</sic></unclear> it gives to the judge</del>, is <add><gap/> it gives to <gap/> may become </add> <lb/>
</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 21:26, 16 February 2013

Click Here To Edit


CERTAINTY. PROCEDURE. LAW & FACT.

It is right of advantage that the power of deciding on questions of law, of the power of deciding on
the question of fact, should be in separate hands: if those two powers are comfor
in the hands of those to whom the latter power alone properly belongs
If in the hands of those to whom former appertains also restraint is gone which
in the that the law declared against this or that man merit law
against all other and .

What verges towards this inconvenience is the latest of too minute generalistations axiomatication
stretching the of law too far, whereby it happens that the rules laid down
are so narrow as not scarce to take in any more others than the case on the occasion ofwhich occasioned
which they were promised. This as to the arbitrary lawer it gives to the judge, is it gives to may become



Identifier: | JB/050/081/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

081

Info in main headings field

certainty procedure law & fact

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16072

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in