★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<p>A prohibition shall go to Court Christian,<lb/> if they compel a man to be a <lb/>witness against himself; for (unless in <lb/>causes matrimonial, & testamentary) <lb/><foreign>nemo <del>tar</del> tenetur prodere seipsum</foreign>. <sic>Cro.</sic> <lb/>E. 201. pl.28. Mich. 32 & 33 Eliz. B. R. Cullier<lb/> v. Cullier.</p> | <p>A prohibition shall go to Court Christian,<lb/> if they compel a man to be a <lb/>witness against himself; for (unless in <lb/>causes matrimonial, & testamentary) <lb/><foreign>nemo <del>tar</del> tenetur prodere seipsum</foreign>. <sic>Cro.</sic> <lb/>E. 201. pl.28. Mich. 32 & 33 Eliz. B. R. Cullier<lb/> v. Cullier.</p> | ||
<p>Mo. 906. pl. 265. Collier v. Collier. S.C. <lb/>it was in a case <del>inst</del> incontinency, & <lb/>the Spiritual Judge would have examined<lb/> the parties upon Oath, whether they did the <lb/>fact or not; and prohibition was granted. — <lb/>4 <del>Los</del> Leon. 194. pl. 307. 32 Eliz. in C.B. the S. <lb/>C. the Court would advise. </p> | |||
Witnesses Not to be enforced to give
Evidence against themselves.
A prohibition shall go to Court Christian,
if they compel a man to be a
witness against himself; for (unless in
causes matrimonial, & testamentary)
nemo tar tenetur prodere seipsum. Cro.
E. 201. pl.28. Mich. 32 & 33 Eliz. B. R. Cullier
v. Cullier.
Mo. 906. pl. 265. Collier v. Collier. S.C.
it was in a case inst incontinency, &
the Spiritual Judge would have examined
the parties upon Oath, whether they did the
fact or not; and prohibition was granted. —
4 Los Leon. 194. pl. 307. 32 Eliz. in C.B. the S.
C. the Court would advise.
|
Identifier: | JB/107/017/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
107 |
evidence |
||
|
017 |
|||
|
001 |
witnesses. not to be enforced to give evidence against themselves |
||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
35008 |
|||
