JB/116/299/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/299/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/299/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/299/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>28</head>
<p>every point except that of the authority under which it has<lb/> been done &#x2014; what follows? what would the guilty gain by it? <lb/>
<hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note>Jeopardy <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> re the necessity what it  <gap/> did it apply to</note> Does the necessity apply itself to the subversion of the constitution,<lb/> and the violation of the fundamental laws? &#x2014; Grant that the <lb/>laws that would have been made <del>this</del> last session, if these <lb/>same self-commissioned legislators had taken upon themselves<lb/> during that time the whole of the business of Parliament <lb/> would have been exactly of the same tenor &#x2014; word for word &#x2014; <lb/>as those that actually were made by Parliament. would this<lb/> have afforded the smallest excuse to them for constituting themselves <lb/>sole legislators in contempt of Parliament. &#x2014; </p> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 01:13, 7 March 2013

Click Here To Edit

28

every point except that of the authority under which it has
been done — what follows? what would the guilty gain by it?
[+] Jeopardy [+] re the necessity what it did it apply to Does the necessity apply itself to the subversion of the constitution,
and the violation of the fundamental laws? — Grant that the
laws that would have been made this last session, if these
same self-commissioned legislators had taken upon themselves
during that time the whole of the business of Parliament
would have been exactly of the same tenor — word for word —
as those that actually were made by Parliament. would this
have afforded the smallest excuse to them for constituting themselves
sole legislators in contempt of Parliament. —



































































Identifier: | JB/116/299/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

299

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d27 f83 / d28 f84

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37832

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in