JB/070/081/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/081/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/081/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/081/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>If the question were, whether upon the single account of their <lb/>being superfluous, to look no further, these forms should or <lb/>should not be abolished, whose soever voice were for the <lb/>affirmation, so should not be mine: <note>Therefore of <unclear><gap/></unclear> I am about to say is paradoxical perhaps in form but in substance just</note> what is ancient in &#x2014; <lb/>matter of political usage, while it is equal to what is new, is <lb/>always better.</p>
 
<p>But when it is considered, that the object which we have <lb/>been holding up to view is so important as that there cannot <lb/>well be another more so that [the sum of all] possible expedi-<lb/>ents together which we can employ for the attainment of it <lb/>can never be too much -- that among these expedients that <lb/>of the exclusion of these forms is one of the most obvious <lb/>&amp; least exceptionable -- that the origin of them is such, as <lb/>that the having been taken up by accident, they have been <lb/>retained through habit without reflections: that the anti-<lb/>quity of them is such, as that there is both a time within <lb/>memory when [as yet] they were not: and another when being <lb/>inveterate they have been departed from, that upon their being made <lb/>to cease, except the consequences that are wished for of &amp; except <lb/>the blotting of so much <unclear><gap/></unclear> paper all things will be precisely
<lb/>in the same state they were in before. That neither privilege <lb/>nor Prerogative are the least concerned in them I am not with-<lb/>out hopes that a busy &amp; enlightened nation &amp; a Legislature &#x2014; <lb/>the flower of that nation, may after due persuasion of the neces-<lb/>sity gird <del><gap/></del> up at length their <del><gap/></del> loins to this important wotk &amp; <lb/>[resolve to] sacrifice prejudice on / at the altar of Utility.</p>
 
<p>In some future age, looking back from the picture of
<lb/>precision and simplicity that is before him, to the memori-<lb/>-als of these never ending janglings, may ask himself with <lb/>wonder whence could have arisen the matter of so many tri-<lb/>umphs: may put to himself with wonder a question which <del><gap/></del> seems <lb/>very different in point of <unclear>propriety</unclear> is supposed to have suggested <lb/>to a Roman. [Livy of the <unclear>Samnites</unclear> Hist. de la Facilite Publique]</p>
<p>Compos. Stat. quâ Stat. Formal peculiarities to be retrenched <unclear><gap/></unclear> <unclear>Leroat</unclear>
 





Revision as of 15:31, 8 October 2010

Click Here To Edit

If the question were, whether upon the single account of their
being superfluous, to look no further, these forms should or
should not be abolished, whose soever voice were for the
affirmation, so should not be mine: Therefore of I am about to say is paradoxical perhaps in form but in substance just what is ancient in —
matter of political usage, while it is equal to what is new, is
always better.

But when it is considered, that the object which we have
been holding up to view is so important as that there cannot
well be another more so that [the sum of all] possible expedi-
ents together which we can employ for the attainment of it
can never be too much -- that among these expedients that
of the exclusion of these forms is one of the most obvious
& least exceptionable -- that the origin of them is such, as
that the having been taken up by accident, they have been
retained through habit without reflections: that the anti-
quity of them is such, as that there is both a time within
memory when [as yet] they were not: and another when being
inveterate they have been departed from, that upon their being made
to cease, except the consequences that are wished for of & except
the blotting of so much paper all things will be precisely
in the same state they were in before. That neither privilege
nor Prerogative are the least concerned in them I am not with-
out hopes that a busy & enlightened nation & a Legislature —
the flower of that nation, may after due persuasion of the neces-
sity gird up at length their loins to this important wotk &
[resolve to] sacrifice prejudice on / at the altar of Utility.

In some future age, looking back from the picture of
precision and simplicity that is before him, to the memori-
-als of these never ending janglings, may ask himself with
wonder whence could have arisen the matter of so many tri-
umphs: may put to himself with wonder a question which seems
very different in point of propriety is supposed to have suggested
to a Roman. [Livy of the Samnites Hist. de la Facilite Publique]

Compos. Stat. quâ Stat. Formal peculiarities to be retrenched Leroat

Identifier: | JB/070/081/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

081

Info in main headings field

compos. stat. qua stat. formal peculiarities to be retrenched perorat.

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23196

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in