JB/100/072/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/100/072/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
by a then late act of Parliament <unclear>?</unclear> was<lb/>
by a then late act of Parliament <unclear>?</unclear> was<lb/>
tolerated.  It was no such thing.  But the Laws<lb/>
tolerated.  It was no such thing.  But the Laws<lb/>
in that as in every other which are such an<lb/>
in that as in every other article are such an<lb/>
unintelligible chaos, there was no convincing<lb/>
unintelligible chaos, there was no convincing<lb/>
them of it.  
them of it.  

Revision as of 18:06, 28 March 2013

Click Here To Edit

C
Of the Composition of the Laws
Note

The late insurrection in London was owing solely
to the defectiveness of the laws in this respect.
It began with hot-headed and intolerant Protestants.
They had beengot it into their heads rude behavior that
by a then late act of Parliament ? was
tolerated. It was no such thing. But the Laws
in that as in every other article are such an
unintelligible chaos, there was no convincing
them of it.




Identifier: | JB/100/072/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

100

Main Headings

Folio number

072

Info in main headings field

of the composition of the laws

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

32088

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in