JB/107/279/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/279/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/279/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/279/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<p>the <sic>fulfillment</sic> of the Royal engagements and<lb/>
the violation<del>s</del> of them such are the questions<lb/>
and the options that are to be made.</p>
 
<p>This is the art of  of which Lawyers<lb/>
are now tired of hearing speaking or reading<lb/>
reasoning which leaves it altogether at the<lb/>
option of the man if power to<lb/>
most agreeable and convenient<lb/>
to himself.</p>
 
<p><note>Principles of Moral &amp; Political Philosophy II. 274</note> "There are two methods" says he"<lb/>
"of administering penal justice</p>
 
<p>"The first method assigns Capital punishments<lb/>
"to few offences and inflicts it invariably.</p>
 
<p>"The second method assigns Capital<lb/>
"punishments to many kinds of Offences<lb/>
"but inflicts it only upon a few examples<lb/>
"of each kind" Thus far D.<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Paley. Not to<lb/>
speak of any more there was however and<lb/>
is yet a third, which though notorious<lb/>
to the last degree of notoriety as well as<lb/>
obvious to the last degree of obviousness neither<lb/>
his learning nor his logic had sufficed<lb/>
to present him with viz the not assigning<lb/>
Capital Punishment to any Offence and <add>thence</add></p>
 
<pb/>





Revision as of 21:52, 1 April 2013

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

the fulfillment of the Royal engagements and
the violations of them such are the questions
and the options that are to be made.

This is the art of of which Lawyers
are now tired of hearing speaking or reading
reasoning which leaves it altogether at the
option of the man if power to
most agreeable and convenient
to himself.

Principles of Moral & Political Philosophy II. 274 "There are two methods" says he"
"of administering penal justice

"The first method assigns Capital punishments
"to few offences and inflicts it invariably.

"The second method assigns Capital
"punishments to many kinds of Offences
"but inflicts it only upon a few examples
"of each kind" Thus far D.r Paley. Not to
speak of any more there was however and
is yet a third, which though notorious
to the last degree of notoriety as well as
obvious to the last degree of obviousness neither
his learning nor his logic had sufficed
to present him with viz the not assigning
Capital Punishment to any Offence and thence


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/107/279/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

279

Info in main headings field

law versus arbitrary power or a hatchet for dr paley's net

Image

002

Titles

capital punishment modes of dealing in respect of it

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[simplified hanoverian royal arms] 1821]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1821

Notes public

ID Number

35270

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in