JB/107/288/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/288/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/288/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/288/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<p>exactly as they are at any rate &#x2014; the<lb/>
supposition of their not standing is,<lb/>
even in the way of supposition, too painful<lb/>
for his endurance. Proceeding on<lb/>
this supposition he puts his question<lb/>
shall execution be given to them in one<lb/>
case <add><!-- in pencil --> crime?</add> only out of ten as at present, or<lb/>
in ten out of ten? His answer is &#x2014; in one<lb/>
crime <add><!-- in pencil -->time</add> only and that one <!-- in pencil -->time being<lb/>
in my conception of the matter one<lb/>
time too many. As to this point laying<lb/>
out of the case the means whereby<lb/>
the Reduction is affected I of course can<lb/>
see no reason for departing from <!-- in pencil -->hence</p>
 
<p>But here again may be seen another<lb/>
gratuitous <del>assumption</del> supposition which<lb/>
lest the confusion should not be yet<lb/>
quite enough is added to the rest. This<lb/>
is that by every person by whom this<lb/>
system of dispensing with the laws<lb/>
nine times out of ten is <hi rend='underline'>not</hi> approved<lb/>
an opinion that cannot but be entertained</p>
 
<pb/>





Revision as of 22:22, 3 April 2013

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

exactly as they are at any rate — the
supposition of their not standing is,
even in the way of supposition, too painful
for his endurance. Proceeding on
this supposition he puts his question
shall execution be given to them in one
case crime? only out of ten as at present, or
in ten out of ten? His answer is — in one
crime time only and that one time being
in my conception of the matter one
time too many. As to this point laying
out of the case the means whereby
the Reduction is affected I of course can
see no reason for departing from hence

But here again may be seen another
gratuitous assumption supposition which
lest the confusion should not be yet
quite enough is added to the rest. This
is that by every person by whom this
system of dispensing with the laws
nine times out of ten is not approved
an opinion that cannot but be entertained


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/107/288/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

288

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[simplified hanoverian royal arms] 1821]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1821

Notes public

ID Number

35279

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in