JB/107/308/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/308/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/308/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/308/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<p>as well as loose in the expression what the<lb/>
object of this paragraph may be is more<lb/>
than I can take upon myself to determine.<lb/>
It seems as if it had for its intention the<lb/>
passing from the preceding topic of inquiry<lb/>
into a fresh one; and after having proved<lb/>
as above that the declared end of the Supreme<lb/>
legislature ought to be defeated in nine<lb/>
instances out of ten, to enquire by what hands<lb/>
this contempt may with most propriety be<lb/>
committed.</p>
 
<p>"The propriety of pardon is properly<lb/>
"reserved to the Chief Magistrate". Matter<lb/>
of fact i.e. of supposed fact affected together<lb/>
with matter of opinion &#x2014; an act of the Judgement,<lb/>
approving of that state of things in<lb/>
the same breath. In the matter of opinion<lb/>
viz that whatever power of remitting punishment<lb/>
is suffered to exist might be vested<lb/>
in the hands of the Chief Magistrate i.e.<lb/>
under the English Constitution which is the<lb/>
only one here in question in the hands of<lb/>
the King to be exercised by his Signature<lb/>
I cannot but concur with him and on <add>that</add></p>


<pb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:30, 7 April 2013

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

as well as loose in the expression what the
object of this paragraph may be is more
than I can take upon myself to determine.
It seems as if it had for its intention the
passing from the preceding topic of inquiry
into a fresh one; and after having proved
as above that the declared end of the Supreme
legislature ought to be defeated in nine
instances out of ten, to enquire by what hands
this contempt may with most propriety be
committed.

"The propriety of pardon is properly
"reserved to the Chief Magistrate". Matter
of fact i.e. of supposed fact affected together
with matter of opinion — an act of the Judgement,
approving of that state of things in
the same breath. In the matter of opinion
viz that whatever power of remitting punishment
is suffered to exist might be vested
in the hands of the Chief Magistrate i.e.
under the English Constitution which is the
only one here in question in the hands of
the King to be exercised by his Signature
I cannot but concur with him and on that


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/107/308/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

308

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[simplified hanoverian royal arms] 1821]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1821

Notes public

ID Number

35299

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in