JB/107/326/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/326/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/326/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/326/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<p>by the individual on whom the fate of each<lb/>
supposed transgressor individually taken<lb/>
depends, any one of them be left unnoticed<lb/>
or misstated the sort of responsibility<lb/>
above mentioned attaches and the Judge<lb/>
stands exposed to censure.</p>
 
<p>But alas! no part indeed was it of<lb/>
the Reverend <sic>Doctors</sic> meaning to recommend<lb/>
any such course: not not in any one<lb/>
of those its three points; and in respect<lb/>
of the first object viz the general rule<lb/>
it is the basis of his system that it was<lb/>
in its nature indescribable and inexpressible.</p>
 
<p>To gain credit indeed for such<lb/>
strictness may perhaps have been within<lb/>
his view viz so far as could be done<lb/>
without earning it. Accordingly no sooner<lb/>
is the Act spoken of as that which<lb/>
ought to be a judicial Act but its title<lb/>
to that character is explained away<lb/>
by the description given of it &#x2014; "impartiality" <add>......</add></p>
 
<pb/>





Revision as of 22:15, 12 April 2013

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

by the individual on whom the fate of each
supposed transgressor individually taken
depends, any one of them be left unnoticed
or misstated the sort of responsibility
above mentioned attaches and the Judge
stands exposed to censure.

But alas! no part indeed was it of
the Reverend Doctors meaning to recommend
any such course: not not in any one
of those its three points; and in respect
of the first object viz the general rule
it is the basis of his system that it was
in its nature indescribable and inexpressible.

To gain credit indeed for such
strictness may perhaps have been within
his view viz so far as could be done
without earning it. Accordingly no sooner
is the Act spoken of as that which
ought to be a judicial Act but its title
to that character is explained away
by the description given of it — "impartiality" ......


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/107/326/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

326

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[simplified hanoverian royal arms] 1821]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1821

Notes public

ID Number

35317

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in