★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/107/296/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/107/296/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <p> so much enamoured</p><lb/><p> "Deliberated upon"? the execution<lb/> of the sentence deliberated upon? How<lb/>and by whom? By the King alone thinking<lb/> in his own person? A supposition so<lb/>extravagant can hardly have been intended.<lb/>For a task like this the whole time of this Royal<lb/>person would hardly be sufficient. Deliberated <lb/>upon by persons more than one speaking as<lb/>well as thinking together? If so draw the consequence.<lb/> Of the materials for such thinking<lb/>and by the Reverend Doctor the part first mentioned<lb/>consist of the "<hi rend='underline'>general</hi>" character of the<lb/>crimes of those in whose instance the execution<lb/>of this sentence i.e. the question whether to<lb/>put them to death according to Law, or to<lb/> save them from it in disobedience to the Law<lb/>is this taken for the subject of deliberation.<lb/>but this "<hi rend='underline'>general</hi>" Character of the Crimes in<lb/>question, by what means is it to be rendered<lb/>the subject of deliberation <del> the <gap/></del> of the conversations<lb/>the existence of which is so decidedly<lb/>assumed ands so thoroughly approved<lb/>of? By what means, but by <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> words </p> <pb> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
so much enamoured
"Deliberated upon"? the execution
of the sentence deliberated upon? How
and by whom? By the King alone thinking
in his own person? A supposition so
extravagant can hardly have been intended.
For a task like this the whole time of this Royal
person would hardly be sufficient. Deliberated
upon by persons more than one speaking as
well as thinking together? If so draw the consequence.
Of the materials for such thinking
and by the Reverend Doctor the part first mentioned
consist of the "general" character of the
crimes of those in whose instance the execution
of this sentence i.e. the question whether to
put them to death according to Law, or to
save them from it in disobedience to the Law
is this taken for the subject of deliberation.
but this "general" Character of the Crimes in
question, by what means is it to be rendered
the subject of deliberation the of the conversations
the existence of which is so decidedly
assumed ands so thoroughly approved
of? By what means, but by general words
<pb>
Identifier: | JB/107/296/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
107 |
law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net) |
||
296 |
|||
001 |
|||
copy/fair copy sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
[[watermarks::[simplified hanoverian royal arms] 1821]] |
|||
1821 |
|||
35287 |
|||