JB/070/175/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/175/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>Libel</head><head>2</head><lb/>If no answer can be given to any of these questions, it is <del><gap/>deleted text</del><add>evident</add> <unclear>these</unclear> can be <add>ground</add><gap/><lb/>to make the <del><gap/>deleted text</del><add>decision</add>of the question "whether a paper is a libel or no" a<lb/>matter of law competent to Judges rather than <add>to</add> a Jury; since <add><gap/>added text</add> the Judges<lb/> <del><unclear>here can</unclear></del> devise <add>in this can<unclear>questionable reading</unclear></add> no advantage whatever from their knowledge of <del>preadjudged</del><add>past</add><gap/><lb/>nor any future Judges in any future case from the knowledge<add>that in question</add> of this<unclear>;</unclear><lb/>the only grounds<gap/>of appropraiting the decision of any question to<lb/>the Judges<del><gap/>deleted text</del><add>in preference<unclear>questionable reading</unclear></add>rather than to a Jury.
<head>2</head>
<head>Libel</head>
<p>If no answer can be given to any of these questions, it is <del>nugatory</del> <add>evident</add> there can be no <add>ground</add> <lb/>to make the <del>constan</del> <add>decision</add> of the question "whether a paper is a libel or no" a<lb/> matter of Law competent to Judges rather than <add>to</add> a Jury; since <add>neither can</add> the Judges <lb/> <del>here can</del> devise <add>in this case </add> no advantage whatever from their knowledge of <del>preadjudged</del><add>past</add><gap/>  
****<lb/>nor any future Judges in any future case from the knowledge<add>that in question</add> of this<unclear>;</unclear><lb/>the only grounds<gap/>of appropraiting the decision of any question to<lb/>the Judges<del><gap/>deleted text</del><add>in preference<unclear>questionable reading</unclear></add>rather than to a Jury.


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 03:19, 19 May 2013

Click Here To Edit

2 Libel

If no answer can be given to any of these questions, it is nugatory evident there can be no ground
to make the constan decision of the question "whether a paper is a libel or no" a
matter of Law competent to Judges rather than to a Jury; since neither can the Judges
here can devise in this case no advantage whatever from their knowledge of preadjudgedpast


        • nor any future Judges in any future case from the knowledgethat in question of this;
          the only groundsof appropraiting the decision of any question to
          the Judgesdeleted textin preferencequestionable readingrather than to a Jury.

Identifier: | JB/070/175/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

175

Info in main headings field

libel

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr motif] [britannia with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23290

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in