JB/070/175/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/175/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>Libel</head>
<head>Libel</head>
<p>If no answer can be given to any of these questions, it is <del>nugatory</del> <add>evident</add> there can be no <add>ground</add> <lb/>to make the <del>constan</del> <add>decision</add> of the question "whether a paper is a libel or no" a<lb/> matter of Law competent to Judges rather than <add>to</add> a Jury; since <add>neither can</add> the Judges <lb/>  <del>here can</del> devise  <add>in this case </add> no advantage whatever from their knowledge of <del>preadjudged</del><add>past</add> <gap/>  
<p>If no answer can be given to any of these questions, it is <del>nugatory</del> <add>evident</add> there can be no <add>ground</add> <lb/>to make the <del>constan</del> <add>decision</add> of the question "whether a paper is a libel or no" a<lb/> matter of Law competent to Judges rather than <add>to</add> a Jury; since <add>neither can</add> the Judges <lb/>  <del>here can</del> devise  <add>in this case </add> no advantage whatever from their knowledge of <del>preadjudged</del><add>past</add> <gap/>  
<lb/>nor any future Judges in any future case from the knowledge <add>that in question</add> of this; <lb/><note>If the Judges cannot tell why they <gap/> this way rather than that, it will be difficult to say what advantage the subject can reap from a decision being [placed] in such hands rather than any other</note><lb/> the only grounds confessed of appropriating the decision of any question to<lb/> the Judges <del><gap/></del> <add>in preference</add> rather than to a Jury. <del>Every case being decided</del> <add>The decision in every case being <gap/></add> upon no<lb/> <gap/> <!-- word is truncated -->principles  
<lb/>nor any future Judges in any future case from the knowledge <add>that in question</add> of this; <lb/><note>If the Judges cannot tell why they <gap/> this way rather than that, it will be difficult to say what advantage the subject can reap from a decision being [placed] in such hands rather than any other</note><lb/> the only grounds confessed of appropriating the decision of any question to<lb/> the Judges <del><gap/></del> <add>in preference</add> rather than to a Jury. <del>Every case being decided</del> <add>The decision in every case being <gap/></add> upon no<lb/> <sic>assig</sic> <!-- word is truncated -->principles must be particular &#x2014; and fortuitous whether in the one or the <lb/>other hands; it is <add>in every case </add> a matter of <gap/> &amp; <gap/> whether a man shall be <add>acquitted</add> <del>acq</del> <lb/>or condemned.</p>





Revision as of 21:47, 19 May 2013

Click Here To Edit

2 Libel

If no answer can be given to any of these questions, it is nugatory evident there can be no ground
to make the constan decision of the question "whether a paper is a libel or no" a
matter of Law competent to Judges rather than to a Jury; since neither can the Judges
here can devise in this case no advantage whatever from their knowledge of preadjudgedpast
nor any future Judges in any future case from the knowledge that in question of this;
If the Judges cannot tell why they this way rather than that, it will be difficult to say what advantage the subject can reap from a decision being [placed] in such hands rather than any other
the only grounds confessed of appropriating the decision of any question to
the Judges in preference rather than to a Jury. Every case being decided The decision in every case being upon no
assig principles must be particular — and fortuitous whether in the one or the
other hands; it is in every case a matter of & whether a man shall be acquitted acq
or condemned.












Identifier: | JB/070/175/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

175

Info in main headings field

libel

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr motif] [britannia with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23290

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in