JB/041/112/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/041/112/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>Constitutional Code</head>
<head>Constitutional Code</head>


<p>6. Power to the <add>a</add> <gap/> Jury at the instance of a party<lb/> to send <del>the</del> up the decision of the Judge for confirmation or <lb/><del>the</del> <unclear>alternative</unclear> <add>charge</add>, in a class of cases in which appeal is<lb/> not allowed in <add>a class of <unclear>final</unclear></add> cases where a Jury is called in: and <lb/>in which, from the assured constancy of <add>groundless</add> Appeal [in cases <lb/> in which guiltiness <del>in</del> is  indubitable] vexation to <del><gap/></del> <lb/>parties <add>injured</add> and Jurors would be preponderant<del>ly</del><add> productive of</add> evil.</p>
<p>6. Power to the <add>a</add> Quasi Jury at the instance of a party<lb/> to send <del>the</del> up the decision of the Judge for confirmation or <lb/><del>the</del> <unclear>alternative</unclear> <add>charge</add>, in a class of cases in which appeal is<lb/> not allowed in <add>a class of <unclear>final</unclear></add> cases where a Jury is called in: and <lb/>in which, from the assured constancy of <add>groundless</add> Appeal [in cases <lb/> in which guiltiness <del>in</del> is  indubitable] vexation to <del><gap/></del> <lb/>parties <add>injured</add> and Jurors would be preponderant<del>ly</del><add> productive of</add> evil.</p>
 
 


<p>7. Power to the Quasi Jury, to allow to the <gap/> <lb/>the faculty of appealing as well as from a judgment of acquittal<lb/> as from a judgment of conviction. <del>from</del> </p>


<p>8. Power to the Quasi Jury to allow to <del>th</del> <add>a</add> Prisoner <lb/><add>in case of conviction</add> the faculty of appealing against the sentence on <lb/>the ground of deficiency as well as to <del>th</del> <add>a</add> Defendant on<lb/> the ground of excess, in the quantum of the punishment. </p> 





Revision as of 19:02, 31 May 2013

'Click Here To Edit

1823. August Sept. 3. Constitutional Code

6. Power to the a Quasi Jury at the instance of a party
to send the up the decision of the Judge for confirmation or
the alternative charge, in a class of cases in which appeal is
not allowed in a class of final cases where a Jury is called in: and
in which, from the assured constancy of groundless Appeal [in cases
in which guiltiness in is indubitable] vexation to
parties injured and Jurors would be preponderantly productive of evil.

7. Power to the Quasi Jury, to allow to the
the faculty of appealing as well as from a judgment of acquittal
as from a judgment of conviction. from

8. Power to the Quasi Jury to allow to th a Prisoner
in case of conviction the faculty of appealing against the sentence on
the ground of deficiency as well as to th a Defendant on
the ground of excess, in the quantum of the punishment.















































































Identifier: | JB/041/112/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

1823-09-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

33-36

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

112

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D10 / E2

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1822

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in